Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 14;20(2):1541.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021541.

Intimate Partner Violence Screening Instruments: A Protocol for a COSMIN-Based Systematic Review

Affiliations

Intimate Partner Violence Screening Instruments: A Protocol for a COSMIN-Based Systematic Review

Yanjia Li et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major public health problem resulting in a significant impediment to equal participation, quality of life, and personal, social, and economic development. At present, a variety of screening instruments for IPV have emerged in developed countries, and some of them have been adapted to the language and culture of different countries, such as Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream (HITS) and the Abuse Assessment Screen (AAS). The selection of the most appropriate IPV screening instrument for the target population and context from among those instruments has become difficult for researchers when intending to start screening. Therefore, a systemic review of IPV screening instruments is needed. This protocol describes a COSMIN-based systematic review of the measurement properties of these instruments. The aims of the systematic review are to (1) evaluate the methodological quality of studies on the measurement properties including the validity, reliability, and internal consistency of these IPV screening instruments, and (2) provide suggestions for relevant researchers in their local context for using the IPV screening instruments.

Keywords: COSMIN; intimate partner violence; screening instruments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ten steps for conducting a systematic review of PROMs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The process of research screening.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO Understanding and Addressing Violence Against Woman. [(accessed on 21 October 2022)]. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77432/1/WHO/_RHR_12.36_eng.pdf.
    1. Dicola D., Spaar E. Intimate partner violence. Am. Fam. Physician. 2016;94:646–651. - PubMed
    1. Gerino E., Caldarera A.M., Curti L., Brustia P., Rollè L. Intimate partner violence in the golden age: Systematic review of risk and protective factors. Front. Psychol. 2018;9:1595. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01595. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharifi F., Jamali J., Larki M., Roudsari R.L. Domestic violence against infertile women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 2022;22:14–27. doi: 10.18295/squmj.5.2021.075. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cresswell K.M., Panesar S.S., Salvilla S.A., Carson-Stevens A., Larizgoitia I., Donaldson L.J., Bates D., Sheikh A. Global research priorities to better understand the burden of iatrogenic harm in primary care: An international Delphi exercise. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001554. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms