Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 16;20(2):1605.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021605.

Individual (Non) Resilience of University Students to Digital Media Manipulation after COVID-19 (Case Study of Slovak Initiatives)

Hedviga Tkácová  1 , Martina Pavlíková  2 , Eva Stranovská  3 , Roman Králik  4
Affiliations

Individual (Non) Resilience of University Students to Digital Media Manipulation after COVID-19 (Case Study of Slovak Initiatives)

Hedviga Tkácová et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The starting point of this theoretical article is the presentation of the issue of media manipulation in the contemporary digital media environment. The theoretical part is followed by a description and analysis of selected factors that create a belief of the individual's resilience to digital media manipulative elements. Among the seven researched factors of an individual's (non) resilience to digital media manipulation, we include: media illiteracy/literacy, thought activity/laziness, searching/not searching for "consensus" in the media, not emphasizing/emphasizing emotions, non-reliance/reliance on own intuition, non-credibility/credibility in the opinion of celebrities and automatic distrust/trust of recipients in the information presented in the media and others. We do not see the presence of manipulative elements in digital media as the main danger (manipulation is always in a sense part of the media message), nor the fact that manipulative elements have an effect on individuals (media-manipulative and non-manipulative-effects cannot be doubted). In our opinion, the very significant risk is the fact that the media message is followed by a false belief of the recipient's own "immunity" against (covert and overt) media manipulation. The result of this false notion is the individual's belief that manipulation in digital media content does not "affect" him ("I can easily recognize media manipulation") and does not "touch" him ("It can't happen to me"). Such a person then resembles a "house on the sand", as his opinions, arguments or beliefs quickly collapse under the onslaught of five skills: challenges in the context of media literacy, critical thinking, strategies for verifying the credibility of information sources, the rational assessment of issues and reflection of reality. This original research article is a qualitative analysis of the legacy of ten Slovak educational initiatives focused on the issue of education in the context of media manipulation. The analysis focuses on the role of individual risk factors associated with resilience. The conclusion of the analysis is the elaboration of a positive proposal for the researched issue.

Keywords: digital media; false resilience; positive proposal; risk factors; youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Research of risk factors of (false) resilience to media manipulation elements (n = 307).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Research of the most important skills for building users´ real resilience (n = 173).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Thompson K., LaRocca D., Gallagher P., Cintron J. Report: The Impact of the Internet and Communication Networks and Technologies on Concepts of and Forms of Democratic Government and Rule. In: Pecorino P., editor. Computers, Information Technology, the Internet, Ethics, Society and Human Values. Queensborough Community College; Queens, NY, USA: 2009. [(accessed on 4 July 2022)]. Available online: https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialsciences/ppecorino/ciseshv_text/Chapter-1....
    1. Cammaerts B., Carpentier N. Reclaiming the Media: Communication Rights and Democratic Media Roles. Intellect Books; Chicago, IL, USA: 2007.
    1. Anderson J., Rainie L. Concerns about Democracy in the Digital Age. 2020. [(accessed on 7 August 2022)]. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/21/concerns-about-democracy...
    1. Giesen L., Wetherall-Grujić G., Mackisack D. Democracy and Technologies: The Team Tested How ChatGPT Could Be Useful for Democracy Technologies. 2022. [(accessed on 1 September 2022)]. Available online: https://democracy-technologies.org/opinion/the-team-tested-how-chatgpt-c...
    1. Bay S., Fredheim R., Haiduchyk T., Dek A. Social Media Manipulation 2021/2022: Assessing the Ability of Social Media Companies to Combat Platform Manipulation. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence; Riga, Latvia: 2022.

Publication types