Endovascular Treatment of Basilar Artery Occlusion: What Can We Learn from the Results?
- PMID: 36676720
- PMCID: PMC9866638
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina59010096
Endovascular Treatment of Basilar Artery Occlusion: What Can We Learn from the Results?
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Current guidelines lack specific endovascular treatment (EVT) recommendations for posterior circulation stroke (PCS). The results of earlier studies are controversial. We aimed to compare early hospital outcomes of stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with EVT or bridging therapy (BT) in anterior circulation stroke (ACS) versus PCS (middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and basilar artery occlusion (BAO), and establish the risk factors for poor outcome. Materials and Methods: we analyzed the data of 279 subjects treated with EVT due to LVO-caused stroke in a comprehensive stroke centre in 2015−2021. The primary outcome was hospital mortality, secondary outcomes were National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) after 24 h, early neurological deterioration, futile recanalization (FR), the ambulatory outcome at discharge, and complications. Results: BAO presented with higher baseline NIHSS scores (19 vs. 14, p < 0.001), and longer door-to-puncture time (93 vs. 82 min, p = 0.034), compared to MCAO. Hospital mortality and the percentage of FR were the same in BAO and almost two times higher than in MCAO (20.0% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.048), other outcomes did not differ. In BAO, unsuccessful recanalization was the only significant predictor of the lethal outcome, though there were trends for PAD and RF predicting lethal outcome. A trend for higher risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was observed in the BAO group when BT was applied. Nevertheless, neither BT nor sICH predicted lethal outcomes in the BAO group. Conclusions: Compared to the modern gold standard of EVT in the ACS, early outcomes in BAO remain poor, there is a substantial amount of FR. Nevertheless, unsuccessful recanalization remains the strongest predictor of lethal outcomes. BT in PCS might pose a higher risk for sICH, but not the lethal outcome, although this finding requires further investigation in larger trials.
Keywords: basilar artery occlusion; bridging therapy; endovascular treatment; posterior circulation stroke; vertebrobasilar stroke.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Keselman B., Gdovinová Z., Jatuzis D., Melo T.P.E., Vilionskis A., Cavallo R., Frol S., Jurak L., Koyuncu B., Nunes A.P., et al. Safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in posterior versus anterior circulation stroke results from the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke registry and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2020;51:876–882. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027071. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Berndt M., Poppert H., Steiger K., Pelisek J., Oberdieck P., Maegerlein C., Zimmer C., Wunderlich S., Friedrich B., Boeckh-Behrens T., et al. Thrombus Histology of Basilar Artery Occlusions: Are There Differences to the Anterior Circulation? Clin. Neuroradiol. 2021;31:753–761. doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00964-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Huo X., Raynald, Gao F., Ma N., Mo D., Sun X., Song L., Jia B., Pan Y., Wang Y., et al. Characteristic and prognosis of acute large vessel occlusion in anterior and posterior circulation after endovascular treatment: The ANGEL registry real world experience. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis. 2020;49:527–532. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02054-2. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nair S.S., Sylaja P.N., Pandian J., Srivastava M.V.P., Khurana D., Kaul S., Arora D., Sarma P.S., Khatter H., Singhal A.B. Impact of revascularization therapies on outcome of posterior circulation ischemic stroke: The Indo-US Stroke Project. J. Neurol. Sci. 2021;427:117499. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117499. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical