Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 12;59(1):153.
doi: 10.3390/medicina59010153.

Impact of a Targeted Project for Shortening of Imaging Diagnostic Waiting Time in Patients with Suspected Oncological Diseases in Hungary

Affiliations

Impact of a Targeted Project for Shortening of Imaging Diagnostic Waiting Time in Patients with Suspected Oncological Diseases in Hungary

Zsombor Mátyás Papp et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Medical imaging is a key element in the clinical workup of patients with suspected oncological disease. In Hungary, due to the high number of patients, waiting lists for Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were created some years ago. The Municipality of Budapest and Semmelweis University signed a cooperation agreement with an extra budget in 2020 (HBP: Healthy Budapest Program) to reduce the waiting lists for these patients. The aim of our study was to analyze the impact of the first experiences with the HBP. Material and Methods: The study database included all the CT/MRI examinations conducted at Semmelweis University with a referral diagnosis of suspected oncological disease within the first 13 months of the HBP (6804 cases). In our retrospective, two-armed, comparative clinical study, different components of the waiting times in the oncology diagnostics pathway were analyzed. Using propensity score matching, we compared the data of the HBP-funded patients (n = 450) to those of the patients with regular care provided by the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) (n = 450). Results: In the HBP-funded vs. the NHIF-funded patients, the time interval from the first suspicion of oncological disease to the request for imaging examinations was on average 15.2 days shorter (16.1 vs. 31.3 days), and the mean waiting time for the CT/MRI examination was reduced by 13.0 days (4.2 vs. 17.2 days, respectively). In addition, the imaging medical records were prepared on average 1.7 days faster for the HBP-funded patients than for the NHIF-funded patients (3.4 vs. 5.1 days, respectively). No further shortening of the different time intervals during the subsequent oncology diagnostic pathway (histological investigation and multidisciplinary team decision) or in the starting of specific oncological therapy (surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy) was observed in the HBP-funded vs. the NHIF-funded patients. We identified a moderately strong negative correlation (r = -0.5736, p = 0.0350) between the CT/MR scans requested and the active COVID-19 case rates during the pandemic waves. Conclusion: The waiting lists for diagnostic CT/MR imaging can be effectively shortened with a targeted project, but a more comprehensive intervention is needed to shorten the time from the radiological diagnosis, through the decisions of the oncoteam, to the start of the oncological treatment.

Keywords: computed tomography (CT); diagnostic pathway; imaging; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); oncology; waiting time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the investigation. HBP: Healthy Budapest Program, NHIF: National Health Insurance Fund.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Share of patient referrals by 23 districts in Budapest.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Monthly numbers of CT/MRI scans performed at Semmelweis University, Medical Imaging Centre during COVID-19 pandemic in Hungary from November 2020 to December 2021. Orange line: COVID-19 pandemic waves in Hungary.

References

    1. Miles K. Can imaging help improve the survival of cancer patients? Cancer Imaging. 2011;11:S86–S92. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2011.9022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hungarian Central Statistical Office. [(accessed on 8 September 2022)]. Available online: https://www.ksh.hu.
    1. Abujudeh H.H., Kaewlai R., Asfaw B.A., Thrall J.H. Quality initiatives: Key performance indicators for measuring and improving radiology department performance. Radiographics. 2010;30:571–580. doi: 10.1148/rg.303095761. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gassert F.G., Ziegelmayer S., Luitjens J., Gassert F.T., Tollens F., Rink J., Makowski M.R., Rübenthaler J., Froelich M.F. Additional MRI for initial M-staging in pancreatic cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2022;32:2448–2456. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08356-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wisnivesky J.P., Mushlin A.I., Sicherman N., Henschke C. The cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: Preliminary results of baseline screening. Chest. 2003;124:614–621. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.2.614. - DOI - PubMed