Antibiotic Susceptibility, Resistance Gene Determinants and Corresponding Genomic Regions in Lactobacillus amylovorus Isolates Derived from Wild Boars and Domestic Pigs
- PMID: 36677394
- PMCID: PMC9863647
- DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11010103
Antibiotic Susceptibility, Resistance Gene Determinants and Corresponding Genomic Regions in Lactobacillus amylovorus Isolates Derived from Wild Boars and Domestic Pigs
Abstract
Restrictions on the use of antibiotics in pigs lead to the continuous search for new probiotics serving as an alternative to antibiotics. One of the key parameters for probiotic bacteria selection is the absence of horizontally transmissible resistance genes. The aim of our study was to determine antibiotic susceptibility profiles in 28 Lactobacillus amylovorus isolates derived from the digestive tract of wild boars and farm pigs by means of the broth microdilution method and whole genome sequencing (WGS). We revealed genetic resistance determinants and examined sequences flanking resistance genes in these strains. Our findings indicate that L. amylovorus strains from domestic pigs are predominantly resistant to tetracycline, erythromycin and ampicillin. WGS analysis of horizontally transmissible genes revealed only three genetic determinants (tetW, ermB and aadE) of which all tetW and ermB genes were present only in strains derived from domestic pigs. Sequence analysis of coding sequences (CDS) in the neighborhood of the tetW gene revealed the presence of site-specific recombinase (xerC/D), site-specific DNA recombinase (spoIVCA) or DNA-binding transcriptional regulator (xre), usually directly downstream of the tetW gene. In the case of ermB, CDS for omega transcriptional repressor or mobilization protein were detected upstream of the ermB gene.
Keywords: Lactobacillus amylovorus; antibiotic resistance; domestic pigs; ermB; tetW; wild boars.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures




References
-
- Van Gompel L., Luiken R.E.C., Sarrazin S., Munk P., Knudsen B.E., Hansen R.B., Bossers A., Aarestrup F.M., Dewulf J., Wagenaar J.A., et al. The Antimicrobial Resistome in Relation to Antimicrobial Use and Biosecurity in Pig Farming, a Metagenome-Wide Association Study in Nine European Countries. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019;74:865–876. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky518. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gerzova L., Babak V., Sedlar K., Faldynova M., Videnska P., Cejkova D., Jensen A.N., Denis M., Kerouanton A., Ricci A., et al. Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance Gene Abundance and Microbiota Composition in Feces of Organic and Conventional Pigs from Four EU Countries. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0132892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132892. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Dowarah R., Verma A.K., Agarwal N., Singh P., Singh B.R. Selection and Characterization of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria and Its Impact on Growth, Nutrient Digestibility, Health and Antioxidant Status in Weaned Piglets. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0192978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192978. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases