Integrated Biological Control of the Sugar Beet Weevil Asproparthenis punctiventris with the Fungus Metarhizium brunneum: New Application Approaches
- PMID: 36678445
- PMCID: PMC9863636
- DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12010099
Integrated Biological Control of the Sugar Beet Weevil Asproparthenis punctiventris with the Fungus Metarhizium brunneum: New Application Approaches
Abstract
The mass occurrence of the sugar beet weevil (Asproparthenis punctiventris, previously Bothynoderes punctiventris) has been endangering sugar beet cultivation in Austria for centuries. Exacerbated by climatic and political changes (warmer, drier spring and limited access to chemical pesticides), new approaches are needed to counter the problem. The aim of our work was to test whether the bioinsecticide Metarhizium brunneum Ma 43 (formerly M. anisopliae var. anisopliae BIPESCO 5/F52) can be used as a sustainable plant protection product against the sugar beet weevil. Our goal was to control the pest in all its development stages through multiple applications. Therefore, GranMetTM-P, a granular formulation of M. brunneum Ma 43, was applied in spring to establish the fungus in the soil, whereas GranMetTM-WP, a liquid formulation of the production strain, was used in early summer on trap ditches and leaves to target the adult weevils. Soil and plant samples as well as weevils were collected during the planting season from the trial sites to evaluate the development of the fungus and the mycosis of the treated weevils. In addition, data on hibernating weevils and their emigration from untreated field sites was collected. In all field sites, the Metarhizium spp. abundance increased above the background level (<1000 CFU g−1 soil dry weight) after application of the product. With an increasing number of treatments per plot, and thus an increased contact possibility between pest and the fungus, a rise in the mycosis rate was observed. In conclusion, the various Metarhizium application strategies, which are already available or in testing, must be implemented to ensure control in both old and new sugar beet fields. Metarhizium is a further asset in the successful control of this sugar beet pest.
Keywords: abundance; entomopathogenic fungus; mass application; mycosis; pest control.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Microsclerotial Granular Formulation of the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium brunneum and Its Combinations With Hydrogel and Imidacloprid Against the Annual Bluegrass Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).J Econ Entomol. 2020 Jun 6;113(3):1118-1128. doi: 10.1093/jee/toaa052. J Econ Entomol. 2020. PMID: 32221577
-
Area-wide mass trapping by pheromone-based attractants for the control of sugar beet weevil (Bothynoderes punctiventris Germar, Coleoptera: Curculionidae).Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Oct;73(10):2174-2183. doi: 10.1002/ps.4601. Epub 2017 Jul 3. Pest Manag Sci. 2017. PMID: 28449326
-
Pathogenicity of an Indigenous Strain of the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) (MET-GRA4 Strain) as a Potential Biological Control Agent Against the Red Palm Weevil (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae).J Econ Entomol. 2020 Feb 8;113(1):43-49. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz233. J Econ Entomol. 2020. PMID: 31586213
-
Efficacy of Two Entomopathogenic Fungi, Metarhizium brunneum, Strain F52 Alone and Combined with Paranosema locustae against the Migratory Grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes, under Laboratory and Greenhouse Conditions.Insects. 2019 Mar 30;10(4):94. doi: 10.3390/insects10040094. Insects. 2019. PMID: 30935086 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Entomopathogenic fungi to control bark beetles: a review of ecological recommendations.Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Sep;77(9):3841-3846. doi: 10.1002/ps.6364. Epub 2021 Apr 2. Pest Manag Sci. 2021. PMID: 33728813 Review.
Cited by
-
Olfactory Responses of Asproparthenis punctiventris Germar to Leaf Odours of Amaranthaceae Plants.Insects. 2024 Apr 22;15(4):297. doi: 10.3390/insects15040297. Insects. 2024. PMID: 38667427 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Guillino M.L., Albajes R., Al-Jboory I., Angelottii F., Chakraborty S., Garret K.A., Hurley B.P., Juroszek P., Makkouk K., Stephenson T. Scientific Review of The Impact of Climate Change on Plant Pests–A Global Challenge to Prevent and Mitigate Plant Pest Risks in Agriculture, Forestry and Ecosystems. FAO on behalf of the IPPC Secretariat; Rome, Italy: 2021. pp. 1–72.
-
- Alexandratos N., Bruinsma J. World Agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2012. pp. 1–147. ESA Working Paper.
-
- Gvozdenac S., Dedić B., Mikić S., Ovuka J., Miladinović D. Impact of Climate Change on Integrated Pest Management Strategies. In: Benkeblia N., editor. Climate Change and Agriculture: Perspectives, Sustainability and Resilience. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2022. pp. 311–372. - DOI
-
- Andrew N.R., Hill S.J. Effect of Climate Change on Insect Pest Management. In: Moshe Col M., Wajnberg E., editors. Environmental Pest Management: Challenges for Agronomists, Ecologists, Economists and Policymakers. Volume 197. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2017. pp. 195–223.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous