Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 30;15(1):128.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010128.

Developments in Combining Targeted Radionuclide Therapies and Immunotherapies for Cancer Treatment

Affiliations
Review

Developments in Combining Targeted Radionuclide Therapies and Immunotherapies for Cancer Treatment

Caroline P Kerr et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) and immunotherapy are rapidly growing classes of cancer treatments. Basic, translational, and clinical research are now investigating therapeutic combinations of these agents. In comparison to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), TRT has the unique advantage of treating all disease sites following intravenous injection and selective tumor uptake and retention-a particularly beneficial property in metastatic disease settings. The therapeutic value of combining radiation therapy with immune checkpoint blockade to treat metastases has been demonstrated in preclinical studies, whereas results of clinical studies have been mixed. Several clinical trials combining TRT and immune checkpoint blockade have been initiated based on preclinical studies combining these with EBRT and/or TRT. Despite the interest in translation of TRT and immunotherapy combinations, many questions remain surrounding the mechanisms of interaction and the optimal approach to clinical implementation of these combinations. This review highlights the mechanisms of interaction between anti-tumor immunity and radiation therapy and the status of basic and translational research and clinical trials investigating combinations of TRT and immunotherapies.

Keywords: anti-tumor immunity; external beam radiation therapy (EBRT); targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT); tumor microenvironment (TME).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.J.G. is the cofounder and Chief Innovation Officer of Voximetry, Inc. J.P.W. is a founder and Chief Science Advisor for Archeus Technologies, which holds the license rights to NM600 related technologies. Z.S.M. is a member of the scientific advisory board for Seneca Therapeutics and Archeus Technologies.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tumor microenvironment irradiation by alpha-emitters versus beta-emitters. Physical property differences of alpha particles and beta particles lead to different tumor irradiation patterns. Alpha particles (high linear energy transfer (LET), short tissue range) traverse 1–2 cell diameters with a high density of ionization events along their track. Beta particles (low LET, long tissue range) travel millimeters in tissue with sparse ionization events, and have the potential to irradiate many structures in addition to the cell of targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) uptake. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of immune activation mechanisms by targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT). Initially, tumor cells treated by TRT undergo immunogenic cell death (ICD), releasing tumor specific antigens in the process, while other surviving cells undergo phenotypic changes. These include increased PD-L1, MHC-I, and Fas expression, as well as IFNβ production through activation of the cGAS/STING pathway. Additionally, innate immune cell populations increase in the tumor microenvironment (TME), including dendritic cells (DCs), natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, and other innate myeloid cells. Finally, a robust adaptive immune response is generated, characterized by increased CTLA-4+ CD8+ and PD-1+ CD8+ T cell populations, as well as effector memory T cell populations, and both increases and decreases in regulatory T cell populations. Created with BioRender.com.

References

    1. Seyfried T.N., Huysentruyt L.C. On the origin of cancer metastasis. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 2013;18:43–73. doi: 10.1615/CritRevOncog.v18.i1-2.40. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murphy J.B., Hussey R.G., Nakahara W., Sturm E. Studies on X-ray effects: Vi. Effect of the cellular reaction induced by X-rays on cancer grafts. J. Exp. Med. 1921;33:299–313. doi: 10.1084/jem.33.3.299. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kinner A., Wu W., Staudt C., Iliakis G. Gamma-h2ax in recognition and signaling of dna double-strand breaks in the context of chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:5678–5694. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn550. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rückert M., Deloch L., Fietkau R., Frey B., Hecht M., Gaipl U.S. Immune modulatory effects of radiotherapy as basis for well-reasoned radioimmunotherapies. Strahlenther. Onkol. 2018;194:509–519. doi: 10.1007/s00066-018-1287-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krysko D.V., Garg A.D., Kaczmarek A., Krysko O., Agostinis P., Vandenabeele P. Immunogenic cell death and damps in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2012;12:860–875. doi: 10.1038/nrc3380. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources