Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 12;15(1):260.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010260.

What Can RNA-Based Therapy Do for Monogenic Diseases?

Affiliations
Review

What Can RNA-Based Therapy Do for Monogenic Diseases?

Luka A Clarke et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

The use of RNA-based approaches to treat monogenic diseases (i.e., hereditary disorders caused by mutations in single genes) has been developed on different fronts. One approach uses small antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) to modulate RNA processing at various stages; namely, to enhance correct splicing, to stimulate exon skipping (to exclude premature termination codon variants), to avoid undesired messenger RNA (mRNA) transcript degradation via the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathway, or to induce mRNA degradation where they encode toxic proteins (e.g., in dominant diseases). Another approach consists in administering mRNA, which, like gene therapy, is a mutation-agnostic approach with potential application to any recessive monogenic disease. This is simpler than gene therapy because instead of requiring targeting of the nucleus, the mRNA only needs to be delivered to the cytoplasm. Although very promising (as demonstrated by COVID-19 vaccines), these approaches still have potential for optimisation, namely regarding delivery efficiency, adverse drug reactions and toxicity.

Keywords: antisense oligonucleotides; mRNA; monogenic disorders; personalized medicine; premature termination codon mutations; splicing mutations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of current therapeutic strategies for genetic diseases targeting DNA, RNA and Protein. Some categories refer specifically to drugs developed for CF [16].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nopoulos P.C. Huntington Disease: A Single-Gene Degenerative Disorder of the Striatum. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2022;18:91–98. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.1/pnopoulos. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robinson P.N., Arteaga-Solis E., Baldock C., Collod-Béroud G., Booms P., De Paepe A., Dietz H.C., Guo G., Handford P.A., Judge D.P., et al. The molecular genetics of Marfan syndrome and related disorders. J. Med. Genet. 2006;43:769–787. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.039669. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Legius E., Messiaen L., Wolkenstein P., Pancza P., Avery R.A., Berman Y., Blakeley J., Babovic-Vuksanovic D., Cunha K.S., Ferner R., et al. Revised diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 and Legius syndrome: An international consensus recommendation. Genet Med. 2021;23:1506–1513. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01170-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Boeck K. Cystic fibrosis in the year 2020: A disease with a new face. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109:893–899. doi: 10.1111/apa.15155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Origa R. β-Thalassemia. Genet Med. 2017;19:609–619. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.173. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources