High intraoperative accuracy and low complication rate of computer-assisted navigation of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty
- PMID: 36681107
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.021
High intraoperative accuracy and low complication rate of computer-assisted navigation of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty
Abstract
Background: Preoperative planning software with intraoperative guidance technology is increasingly being used to manage complex glenoid deformity in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse TSA. The aim of this study was to review the intraoperative efficacy and complications of computer-assisted navigation (CAN) surgery for the treatment of glenoid deformity in TSA.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all TSAs implanted using a single computer navigation shoulder system. All patients underwent preoperative planning with computed tomography-based preoperative planning software. The starting point on the glenoid and the final version and inclination of the central post (cage) of the glenoid component were reviewed on the intraoperative navigation guidance report and compared with these parameters on the preoperative plan for each patient. The intraoperative accuracy of CAN for glenoid positioning was determined by the deviation of the starting point and final position of the central cage drill in the glenoid compared with the preoperative plan. Data regarding intraoperative complications and the number of times the navigation system was abandoned intraoperatively were collected.
Results: A total of 16,723 anatomic TSAs and reverse TSAs performed worldwide with the aforementioned navigation system were included in this review. In 16,368 cases (98%), every step of the navigation procedure was completed without abandoning use of the system intraoperatively. There was minimal deviation in the intraoperative execution of the preoperative plan with respect to version (0.6° ± 1.96°), inclination (0.2° ± 2.04°), and the starting point on the glenoid face (1.90 ± 1.2 mm). In this cohort, 9 coracoid fractures (0.05%) were reported.
Conclusion and discussion: This study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of CAN for glenoid implantation in TSA. Future studies should focus on assessing the impact of CAN on the longevity and survival of glenoid components and improving the cost-effectiveness of this technology.
Keywords: Total shoulder arthroplasty; computer-assisted surgery; glenoid; navigation.
Copyright © 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Computer navigation re-creates planned glenoid placement and reduces correction variability in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo case-control study.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Dec;28(12):e398-e409. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.037. Epub 2019 Jul 26. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019. PMID: 31353300
-
Computer navigation leads to more accurate glenoid targeting during total shoulder arthroplasty compared with 3-dimensional preoperative planning alone.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Nov;29(11):2257-2263. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Jun 9. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020. PMID: 32586595
-
Glenoid component placement accuracy in total shoulder arthroplasty with preoperative planning and standard instrumentation is not influenced by supero-inferior glenoid erosion.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):3159-3165. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03546-6. Epub 2023 Apr 17. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023. PMID: 37067536
-
The Value of Computer-Assisted Navigation for Glenoid Baseplate Implantation in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JBJS Rev. 2023 Aug 24;11(8). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00038. eCollection 2023 Aug 1. JBJS Rev. 2023. PMID: 37616447
-
Computer navigation and patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty.Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2014 Dec;22(4):e42-9. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000045. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2014. PMID: 25370882 Review.
Cited by
-
Current trends in shoulder arthroplasty - Are the trends backed by evidence?J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Dec 27;62:102897. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102897. eCollection 2025 Mar. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024. PMID: 39872122
-
Complications following shoulder arthroplasty: A review of the recent literature.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Nov 28;60:102850. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102850. eCollection 2025 Jan. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024. PMID: 39759466 No abstract available.
-
Computer-Assisted Navigation in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 17;14(8):2763. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082763. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40283593 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Three-dimensional planning, navigation, patient-specific instrumentation and mixed reality in shoulder arthroplasty: a digital orthopedic renaissance.EFORT Open Rev. 2024 Jun 3;9(6):517-527. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0200. EFORT Open Rev. 2024. PMID: 38828974 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of computed tomography for shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review.J Orthop. 2024 May 13;59:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.05.007. eCollection 2025 Jan. J Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39351268
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials