Different diagnostic strategies using D-dimer for peripherally inserted central catheter-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis
- PMID: 36681296
- PMCID: PMC12245457
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.07.018
Different diagnostic strategies using D-dimer for peripherally inserted central catheter-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis
Abstract
Objective: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the upper extremities caused by a peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) is distinct from the typical DVT. This specific type of mural thrombus might have an effect on the D-dimer levels. In the present study, we aimed to ascertain whether the D-dimer level might be considered an independent diagnostic marker to rule out upper extremity DVT caused by PICCs.
Methods: We performed a retrospective case-cohort study of 205 patients who had undergone D-dimer measurement and color Doppler ultrasound within 14 days after placement of a PICC to December 31, 2020, from January 1, 2018. The participants were followed up for 3 months to evaluate for upper extremity DVT. In addition, different D-dimer diagnostic strategies were analyzed.
Results: Of the 205 included patients, 53 (25.9%) had had a negative D-dimer level. Of the 53 patients, 10 had had upper extremity DVT attributable to a PICC using color Doppler ultrasound. Of these 10 patients, 3 had developed upper extremity DVT during the 3-month follow-up. Using the various D-dimer diagnostic techniques, the negative predictive value for the D-dimer levels was 81.1%.
Conclusions: The present study has shown that the different D-dimer diagnostic strategies are not effective for safely excluding the diagnosis of suspected PICC-related upper extremity DVT. Adding PICC placement as a special factor in the modified Wells score, in addition to the D-dimer level, could securely rule out PICC-related upper extremity DVT; however, the diagnostic efficacy was low.
Keywords: D-dimer; Deep vein thrombosis; Diagnostic strategy; Negative predictive value; Peripherally inserted central venous catheter.
Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Peripherally inserted central catheter design and material for reducing catheter failure and complications.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 28;6(6):CD013366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013366.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38940297 Free PMC article.
-
Central venous catheter-related thrombosis in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.J Vasc Access. 2025 Jul;26(4):1180-1186. doi: 10.1177/11297298241262821. Epub 2024 Aug 1. J Vasc Access. 2025. PMID: 39091098
-
Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis Associated With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters of Different Diameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296221144041. doi: 10.1177/10760296221144041. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023. PMID: 37366542 Free PMC article.
-
Advantages and disadvantages of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) compared to other central venous lines: a systematic review of the literature.Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun;52(5):886-92. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.773072. Epub 2013 Mar 11. Acta Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23472835
-
D-dimer level for ruling out peripherally inserted central catheter-associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis and superficial vein thrombosis.Nurs Open. 2022 Nov;9(6):2899-2907. doi: 10.1002/nop2.998. Epub 2021 Aug 16. Nurs Open. 2022. PMID: 34399039 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: Where are we at and where are we going? Updates and ongoing unmet clinical needs.Eur J Clin Invest. 2025 Jan;55(1):e14311. doi: 10.1111/eci.14311. Epub 2024 Sep 12. Eur J Clin Invest. 2025. PMID: 39262322 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter-related venous thrombosis in adult patients with cancer.Thromb J. 2024 Jan 4;22(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12959-023-00574-4. Thromb J. 2024. PMID: 38178101 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chopra V., Anand S., Hickner A., Buist M., Rogers M.A., Saint S., et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:311–325. - PubMed
-
- Baumann K.L., Jaffray J., Carrier M. Epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of catheter-related thrombosis in children and adults. Thromb Res. 2017;157:64–71. - PubMed
-
- Evans R.S., Sharp J.H., Linford L.H., Lloyd J.F., Tripp J.S., Jones J.P., et al. Risk of symptomatic DVT associated with peripherally inserted central catheters. Chest. 2010;138:803–810. - PubMed
-
- Sharp R., Cummings M., Fielder A., Mikocka-Walus A., Grech C., Esterman A. The catheter to vein ratio and rates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC): a prospective cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52:677–685. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources