Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;48(4):683-689.
doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01535-1. Epub 2023 Jan 21.

Cholinergic system adaptations are associated with cognitive function in people recently abstinent from smoking: a (-)-[18F]flubatine PET study

Affiliations

Cholinergic system adaptations are associated with cognitive function in people recently abstinent from smoking: a (-)-[18F]flubatine PET study

Katina C Calakos et al. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

The cholinergic system is a critical mediator of cognition in animals. People who smoke cigarettes exhibit cognitive deficits, especially during quit attempts. Few studies jointly examine the cholinergic system and cognition in people while trying to quit smoking. We used positron emission tomography (PET) brain imaging with the β2-subunit containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (β2*-nAChR) partial agonist radioligand (-)-[18F]flubatine and the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine to jointly examine the cholinergic system, smoking status, and cognition. (-)-[18F]Flubatine scans and cognitive data were acquired from twenty people who recently stopped smoking cigarettes (aged 38 ± 11 years; 6 female, 14 male; abstinent 7 ± 1 days) and 27 people who never smoked cigarettes (aged 29 ± 8 years; 11 female, 16 male). A subset of fifteen recently abstinent smokers and 21 never smokers received a mid-scan physostigmine challenge to increase acetylcholine levels. Regional volume of distribution (VT) was estimated with equilibrium analysis at "baseline" and post-physostigmine. Participants completed a cognitive battery prior to (-)-[18F]flubatine injection and physostigmine administration assessing executive function (Groton Maze Learning test), verbal learning (International Shopping List test), and working memory (One Back test). Physostigmine significantly decreased cortical (-)-[18F]flubatine VT, consistent with increased cortical acetylcholine levels reducing the number of β2*-nAChR sites available for (-)-[18F]flubatine binding, at comparable magnitudes across groups (p values < 0.05). A larger magnitude of physostigmine-induced decrease in (-)-[18F]flubatine VT was significantly associated with worse executive function in people who recently stopped smoking (p values < 0.05). These findings underscore the role of the cholinergic system in early smoking cessation and highlight the importance of neuroscience-informed treatment strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Physostigmine-induced percent change in β2*-nAChR availability in people who never smoked cigarettes and people who recently stopped smoking cigarettes.
In the frontal cortex, physostigmine significantly decreases estimates of β2*-nAChR availability ((-)-[18F]flubatine VT) in people who never smoked cigarettes (light circles) (puncorr < 0.001) and ‘trend’-level decreases estimates in people who recently stopped smoking cigarettes (dark squares) (puncorr = 0.068). Physostigmine significantly decreases estimates of β2*-nAChR availability in the occipital, parietal, and temporal cortices of people who never smoked cigarettes (pcorr-values<0.05), and in the occipital and parietal cortices of people who recently stopped smoking cigarettes (pcorr-values<0.05). The magnitude of physostigmine-induced percent change in β2*-nAChR availability is not significantly different between groups in any regions. Mean VT (bars) and group mean values of physostigmine-induced percent change in β2*-nAChR availability (percentages) are presented. n: sample size.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Executive function and physostigmine-induced percent change in β2*-nAChR availability in people who recently stopped smoking cigarettes.
People who recently stopped smoking cigarettes (‘AS,’ or ‘abstinent smokers,’ dark squares) do not significantly differ from people who never smoked cigarettes (‘NS,’ light circles) in number of errors made on the ‘Groton Maze Learning’ executive function task (NS: 49 ± 15 errors; AS: 48 ± 21 errors; pcorr = 0.90) (left panel). Higher number of errors made (i.e., worse executive function) is associated with higher physostigmine-induced percent change in (-)-[18F]flubatine VT (%ΔVT) estimates (i.e., higher magnitude increase in acetylcholine levels) in the frontal cortex of people who recently stopped smoking (r = 0.73, pcorr = 0.009) (right panel). Plots include task-completing individuals who received physostigmine. The plots are generated with distributions, sample sizes, and statistical analyses which exclude one statistical outlier who recently stopped smoking, included as a hollow marker for transparency. n: sample size. Horizontal bars (left panel): group mean task performance speed. r: Pearson correlation coefficient. Significance: *p < 0.05.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Working memory and β2*-nAChR availability in low-cotinine people who recently stopped smoking cigarettes.
Low-cotinine people who recently stopped smoking cigarettes (‘AS,’ or ‘abstinent smokers,’ dark squares) do not significantly differ from people who never smoked cigarettes (‘NS,’ light circles) in performance speed on the ‘One-Back’ working memory task (NS: 2.9 ± 0.1 log10 ms; AS: 2.9 ± 0.1 log10 ms; p = 0.49) (left panel). Slower task performance (i.e., worse working memory) is associated with higher (-)-[18F]flubatine VT estimates (i.e., higher β2*-nAChR availability) in the frontal cortex of low-cotinine people who recently stopped smoking (r = 0.59, puncorr = 0.045), without correction for multiple cognitive tasks (right panel). This relationship becomes statistically non-significant after correction for multiple cognitive tasks (pcorr = 0.14). n: sample size. Horizontal bars (left panel): group mean task performance speed. r: Pearson correlation coefficient. Significance: *p < 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. West R. Tobacco smoking: health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychol Health. 2017;32:1018–36. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1325890. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Creamer M, Wang T, Babb S, Cullen K, Day H, Willis G, et al. Tobacco product use and cessation indicators among adults—United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68:1013–9. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6845a2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leventhal AM, Waters AJ, Moolchan ET, Heishman SJ, Pickworth WB. A quantitative analysis of subjective, cognitive, and physiological manifestations of the acute tobacco abstinence syndrome. Addict Behav. 2010;35:1120–30. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Powell JH, Pickering AD, Dawkins L, West R, Powell JF. Cognitive and psychological correlates of smoking abstinence, and predictors of successful cessation. Addict Behav. 2004;29:1407–26. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.06.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashare RL, Falcone M, Lerman C. Cognitive function during nicotine withdrawal: Implications for nicotine dependence treatment. Neuropharmacology. 2014;76:581–91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.034. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types