Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov-Dec;23(8):1588-1597.
doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 20.

Validation of a Process for Shared Decision-Making in Pediatrics

Affiliations

Validation of a Process for Shared Decision-Making in Pediatrics

Douglas J Opel et al. Acad Pediatr. 2023 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to confirm, refute, or modify a 4-step process for implementing shared decision-making (SDM) in pediatrics that involves determining 1) if the decision includes >1 medically reasonable option; 2) if one option has a favorable medical benefit-burden ratio compared to other options; and 3) parents' preferences regarding the options; then 4) calibrating the SDM approach based on other relevant decision characteristics.

Methods: We videotaped a purposive sample of pediatric inpatient and outpatient encounters at a single US children's hospital. Clinicians from 7 clinical services (craniofacial, neonatology, oncology, pulmonary, pediatric intensive care, hospital medicine, and sports medicine) were eligible. English-speaking parents of children who participated in inpatient family care conferences or outpatient problem-oriented encounters with participating clinicians were eligible. We conducted individual postencounter interviews with clinician and parent participants utilizing video-stimulated recall to facilitate reflection of decision-making that occurred during the encounter. We utilized direct content analysis with open coding of interview transcripts to determine the salience of the 4-step SDM process and identify themes that confirmed, refuted, or modified this process.

Results: We videotaped 30 encounters and conducted 53 interviews. We found that clinicians' and parents' experiences of decision-making confirmed each SDM step. However, there was variation in the interpretation of each step and a need for flexibility in implementing the process depending on specific decisional contexts.

Conclusions: The 4-step SDM process for pediatrics appears to be salient and may benefit from further guidance about the interpretation of each step and contextual factors that support a modified approach.

Keywords: decision-making; pediatrics; shared.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.
Distribution of videotaped encounters and interviews by child age and clinical service.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW. Prime time for shared decision making. JAMA. 2017;317:1309–1310. - PubMed
    1. Aronson PL, Fraenkel L. Is shared decision-making the right approach for febrile infants? Pediatrics. 2017;140: e20170225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Opel DJ. A push for progress with shared decision-making in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2017;139: e20162526. - PubMed
    1. Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making. 2015;35:114–131. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361–1367. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources