Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;119(3):355-363.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.022. Epub 2023 Jan 20.

Racial disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis: a systematic review and application of social, structural, and political context

Jodie G Katon  1 , Torie C Plowden  2 , Erica E Marsh  3
Affiliations

Racial disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis: a systematic review and application of social, structural, and political context

Jodie G Katon et al. Fertil Steril. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Importance: Uterine fibroids and endometriosis are 2 of the leading causes of morbidity among reproductive-aged women. There are significant racial disparities in disease prevalence, incidence, age of onset, and treatment profile in fibroids. The data on endometriosis are less clear.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of racial disparities in prevalence of uterine fibroids and endometriosis in the United States and summarize the literature on these 2 highly prevalent benign gynecologic conditions using a framework that explicitly incorporates and acknowledges the social, structural, and political contexts as a root cause of racial disparities between Black and White women.

Evidence review: A systematic review regarding racial disparities in prevalence of fibroids and endometriosis was conducted separately. Two separate searches were conducted in PubMed to identify relevant original research manuscripts and prior systematic reviews regarding racial disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis using standardized search terms. In addition, we conducted a structured literature search to provide social, structural, and political context of the disparities.

Findings: A systematic review of the literature indicated that the prevalence of uterine fibroids was consistently higher in Black than in White women with the magnitude of the difference varying depending on population and case definition. Prevalence of endometriosis varied considerably depending on the base population and case definition, but was the same or lower among Black vs. White women. As a result of the social, structural, and political context in the United States, Black women disproportionately experience a range of exposures across the life course that may contribute to their increased uterine fibroid incidence, prevalence, and severity of uterine fibroids. However, data suggest no racial difference in the incidence of endometriosis. Nevertheless, Black women with fibroids or endometriosis experience worse clinical and surgical outcomes than their White counterparts.

Conclusion and relevance: Racial disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis can be linked with differential exposures to suspected etiologic agents, lack of adequate access to health care, including highly skilled gynecologic surgeons, and bias and discrimination within the health care system. Eliminating these racial disparities will require solutions that address root causes of health disparities through policy, education and programs to ensure that all patients receive culturally- and structurally-competent care.

Keywords: Fibroids; allostatic load; endometriosis; racial disparities; racism; structural determinants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Conceptual model for the social, structural, and political determinants of racial health disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Flow chart for sequential article exclusion for the systematic review of racial disparities in prevalence of uterine fibroids and endometriosis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Crear-Perry J, Correa-de-Araujo R, Lewis Johnson T, McLemore MR, Neilson E, Wallace M. Social and Structural Determinants of Health Inequities in Maternal Health. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021;30(2):230–5. Epub 2020/11/13. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8882. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diderichsen F, Evans T, Whitehead M. The social basis of disparitie sin health. In: Evans T, Whitehead M, Diderichsen F, Bhuiya A, Wirth M, editors. Challenging Inequities in Health. New York, YY: Oxford University Press; 2001.
    1. Hofrichter R, Bhatia R. Tackling Health Inequities Through Public Health Practice: Theory to Action: Oxford University Press; 2010.
    1. Zota AR, VanNoy BN. Integrating Intersectionality Into the Exposome Paradigm: A Novel Approach to Racial Inequities in Uterine Fibroids. Am J Public Health. 2021;111(1):104–9. Epub 2020/11/20. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305979. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braveman P What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Rep. 2014;129 Suppl 2:5–8. Epub 2014/01/05. doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S203. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types