Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 15;129(6):925-933.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.34573. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

Race, geography, and risk of breast cancer treatment delays: A population-based study 2004-2015

Affiliations

Race, geography, and risk of breast cancer treatment delays: A population-based study 2004-2015

Katherine E Reeder-Hayes et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Treatment delays affect breast cancer survival and constitute poor-quality care. Black patients experience more treatment delay, but the relationship of geography to these disparities is poorly understood.

Methods: We studied a population-based, retrospective, observational cohort of patients with breast cancer in North Carolina between 2004 and 2017 from the Cancer Information and Population Health Resource, which links cancer registry and sociodemographic data to multipayer insurance claims. We included patients >18 years with Stage I-III breast cancer who received surgery or chemotherapy as their first treatment. Delay was defined as >60 days from diagnosis to first treatment. Counties were aggregated into nine Area Health Education Center regions. Race was dichotomized as Black versus non-Black.

Results: Among 32,626 patients, 6190 (19.0%) were Black. Black patients were more likely to experience treatment delay >60 days (15.0% of Black vs. 8.0% of non-Black). Using race-stratified modified Poisson regression, age-adjusted relative risk of delay in the highest risk region was approximately twice that in the lowest risk region among Black (relative risk, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.6-2.6) and non-Black patients (relative risk, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-2.3). Adjustment for clinical and sociodemographic features only slightly attenuated interregion differences. The magnitude of the racial gap in treatment delay varied by region, from 0.0% to 9.4%.

Conclusions: Geographic region was significantly associated with risk of treatment delays for both Black and non-Black patients. The magnitude of racial disparities in treatment delay varied markedly between regions. Future studies should consider both high-risk geographic regions and high-risk patient groups for intervention to prevent delays.

Keywords: Breast Cancer; Cohort Study; Geographical Distribution; Racial Disparities; Treatment Initiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Stephanie B. Wheeler received unrelated grant funding paid to their institution by the Pfizer Medical Foundation. All other authors made no disclosures.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Choropleth maps illustrating the magnitude of racial disparity by region (A), and distributions among Black (B) and non-Black (C) patients. Estimates of% delayed are adjusted for age, stage, first treatment type, and hormone receptor status. Darker areas indicate more delays or greater difference in delays. NS indicates nonsignificant Black-non-Black difference after false discovery rate adjustment. All other region differences were statistically significant.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Predicted treatment delays among Black and non-Black patients across regions. aEstimates adjusted for age, first treatment type, stage at diagnosis, and hormone receptor status. NS indicates nonsignificant difference in risk by race for AHEC region 2 after false-discovery rate adjustment. *Indicates statistically significant difference. AHEC, Area Health Education Center.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Predicted treatment delay by race and clinical characteristics. aEstimates adjusted for age, first treatment type, stage at diagnosis, and hormone receptor status. *Indicates statistically significant difference.

References

    1. de Melo Gagliato D, Lei X, Giordano SH, et al. Impact of delayed neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy on overall survival among patients with breast cancer. Oncology. 2020;25(9):749–757. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0744 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith EC, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H. Delay in surgical treatment and survival after breast cancer diagnosis in young women by race/ethnicity. JAMA Surg. 2013; 148(6):516–523. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1680 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mateo AM, Mazor AM, Obeid E, et al. Time to surgery and the impact of delay in the non-neoadjuvant setting on triple-negative breast cancers and other phenotypes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(5):1679–1692. doi:10.1245/sl0434-019-08050-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bleicher RJ, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Time to surgery and breast cancer survival in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(3):330–339. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4508 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raphael MJ, Biagi JJ, Kong W, Mates M, Booth CM, Mackillop WJ. The relationship between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;160(l):17–28. doi:10.1007/s10549-016-3960-3 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types