Development and verification of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of dronedarone and its active metabolite N-desbutyldronedarone: Application to prospective simulation of complex drug-drug interaction with rivaroxaban
- PMID: 36683488
- DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15670
Development and verification of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of dronedarone and its active metabolite N-desbutyldronedarone: Application to prospective simulation of complex drug-drug interaction with rivaroxaban
Abstract
Aims: Despite potential enzyme- and transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between dronedarone and rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data remain limited to guide clinical practice. We aimed to develop, verify and validate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of dronedarone and its major metabolite, N-desbutyldronedarone (NDBD), to prospectively interrogate this clinically relevant DDI in healthy and mild renal impairment populations.
Methods: The middle-out development of our PBPK model combined literature-derived or in-house in vitro data, predicted in silico data and in vivo clinical data. Model verification was performed for intravenous and oral (single and multiple) dosing regimens. Model validation for the accurate prediction of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4- and P-glycoprotein-mediated DDI utilized simvastatin and digoxin as respective victim drugs. Rivaroxaban-specific inhibitory parameters of dronedarone and/or NDBD against CYP3A4, CYP2J2, OAT3 and P-glycoprotein were incorporated into the PBPK-DDI model for prospective dronedarone-rivaroxaban DDI simulation.
Results: Dronedarone and NDBD PK following clinically relevant doses of 400 mg dronedarone across single and multiple oral dosing were accurately simulated by incorporating effect of auto-inactivation on dose nonlinearities. Following successful model validation, nondose-adjusted rivaroxaban-dronedarone DDI in healthy and mild renal impairment populations revealed simulated rivaroxaban area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to 24 h fold change greater than dose exposure equivalence (0.70-1.43) at 1.65 and 1.84, respectively. Correspondingly, respective major bleeding risk was 4.24 and 4.70% compared with threshold of 4.5% representing contraindicated rivaroxaban-ketoconazole DDI.
Conclusion: Our PBPK-DDI model predicted clinically significant dronedarone-rivaroxaban DDI in both healthy and mild renal impairment subjects. Greater benefit vs. risk could be achieved with rivaroxaban dose reductions to at least 15 mg in mild renal impairment subjects on concomitant dronedarone and rivaroxaban.
Keywords: N-desbutyldronedarone; dronedarone; drug-drug interactions; physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling; rivaroxaban.
© 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.
Similar articles
-
Predicting drug-drug interactions with physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and optimal dosing of apixaban and rivaroxaban with dronedarone co-administration.Thromb Res. 2022 Oct;218:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Aug 11. Thromb Res. 2022. PMID: 35985100
-
Systematic Development and Verification of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Rivaroxaban.Drug Metab Dispos. 2019 Nov;47(11):1291-1306. doi: 10.1124/dmd.119.086918. Epub 2019 Sep 10. Drug Metab Dispos. 2019. PMID: 31506301
-
Investigation of the arcane inhibition of human organic anion transporter 3 by benzofuran antiarrhythmic agents.Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2021 Jun;38:100390. doi: 10.1016/j.dmpk.2021.100390. Epub 2021 Mar 20. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2021. PMID: 33836300
-
Clinical significance of the rivaroxaban-dronedarone interaction: insights from physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling.Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Jan 23;3(1):oead004. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead004. eCollection 2023 Jan. Eur Heart J Open. 2023. PMID: 36820238 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions with new oral anticoagulants: what do they mean for patients with atrial fibrillation?Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Nov;47(11):1478-87. doi: 10.1177/1060028013504741. Epub 2013 Oct 9. Ann Pharmacother. 2013. PMID: 24259602 Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):373-498. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612
-
- January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society. Circulation. 2014;130(23):e199-e267. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000041/-/DC2
-
- Freemantle N, Lafuente-Lafuente C, Mitchell S, Eckert L, Reynolds M. Mixed treatment comparison of dronedarone, amiodarone, sotalol, flecainide, and propafenone, for the management of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2011;13(3):329-345. doi:10.1093/EUROPACE/EUQ450
-
- Greene HL, Waldo AL, Corley SD, et al. Maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: an AFFIRM substudy of the first antiarrhythmic drug. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(1):20-29. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00559-X
-
- Vorperian VR, Havighurst TC, Miller S, January CT. Adverse effects of low dose amiodarone: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(3):791-798. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00220-9
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources