Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 12;9(6):654-662.
doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.36937. eCollection 2022.

Turkish validity and reliability of Type-1 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale

Affiliations

Turkish validity and reliability of Type-1 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale

Ece Mutlu Satil et al. North Clin Istanb. .

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to carry out validity and reliability of Type 1 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-1) in Turkish.

Methods: The methodological study was conducted between December 2017 and May 2019, with 147 patients with Type 1 diabetes who applied to the Endocrinology, Internal Medicine policlinics of a Training and Research Hospital. The data were collected with the Introductory Information Form and DSAS-1. SPSS-22 and Mplus Version-7.4 were used for data analysis. Validity (group-back translation method, Polit and Beck technique, factor analysis, and known-group comparison and pilot study) and reliability (test-retest reliability, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient, and item-total correlation) analyses were used.

Results: It was found that 94.7% of the content validity index of the items of the DSAS-1 was 0.80 or above; the scale can factorable (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin=0.86) and it was determined that the scale was able to separate known groups; the scale confirmed the 3-factor structure according to confirmatory factor analysis; the factor loads varied between 0.34 and 0.87 and their level was suitable according to fit index criteria (CFI=0.90, TLI=0.89, RMSEA=0.069, SRMR=0.065, Chi-square/df=1.706); the test-retest reliability value (r) was above 0.82; Cronbach's alpha coefficient of Turkish DSAS-1 was 0.89; and Cronbach's alpha coefficient of subscales was, respectively, to be 0.81, 0.80, and 0.81.

Conclusion: It was found that the DSAS-1 has validity and reliability in Turkish and is a suitable measurement tool to evaluate the stigma by the individuals with a diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes in Turkiye.

Keywords: Stigma; type 1 diabetes mellitus; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Path diagram of Type 1 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation . 9th Ed. Brussels, Belgium: 2019. IDF Diabetes Atlas. - PubMed
    1. Stuckey HL, Mullan-Jensen CB, Reach G, Kovacs Burns K, Piana N, Vallis M, et al. Personal accounts of the negative and adaptive psychosocial experiences of people with diabetes in the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2466–74. - PubMed
    1. Nicolucci A, Kovacs Burns K, Holt RI, Comaschi M, Hermanns N, Ishii H, et al. DAWN2 Study Group Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): cross-national benchmarking of diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30:767–77. - PubMed
    1. Kato A, Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T. A closer inspection of diabetes-related stigma: why more research is needed. Diabetol Int. 2019;11:73–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goffman E. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity.

LinkOut - more resources