Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Sep;50(9):1178-83.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.50.9.1178.

Reaction times and attention in Parkinson's disease

Affiliations

Reaction times and attention in Parkinson's disease

C A Bloxham et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Sep.

Abstract

Ten patients with Parkinson's disease performed a simple reaction time task in which, on hearing a tone, they pressed a button with the left thumb. In the first experiment tones sometimes occurred unannounced and at other times were preceded (by between 0 and 3200 ms) by a warning signal. The second experiment was identical to the first except that the subject had simultaneously to perform a simple continuous task with his right hand. Patients had slower reaction times than controls under all circumstances. In general, however, the effect of a warning signal and the effect of a second task were the same for both groups. In the control group the effect of a warning signal depended on whether or not a second task was being performed. Specifically, the advantage of a warning signal for reaction time was lost after long intervals (greater than 200 ms) when a second task was being performed. Parkinson's disease patients lost this advantage even when they were not performing a second task. Animal studies have suggested that dopamine deficiency results in an increase in neural "noise" in the basal ganglia. The behavioural consequences of this may be that Parkinson's disease patients always perform as if they were carrying out another task at the same time. In contrast, their ability to benefit from a warning signal and to allocate attentional resources are unimpaired.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 1971 Apr;46(4):231-9 - PubMed
    1. J Neural Transm. 1976;38(3-4):271-6 - PubMed
    1. Neuroscience. 1984 Aug;12(4):1201-12 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1982;Suppl 5:216-22 - PubMed
    1. Brain. 1984 Jun;107 ( Pt 2):371-84 - PubMed