Evaluation of the accuracy of dental casts manufactured with 3D printing technique in the All-on-4 treatment concept
- PMID: 36685787
- PMCID: PMC9832145
- DOI: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.379
Evaluation of the accuracy of dental casts manufactured with 3D printing technique in the All-on-4 treatment concept
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the casts obtained by using conventional techniques and liquid crystal display (LCD) three-dimensional (3D) print techniques in the All-on-4 treatment concept of the edentulous mandibular jaw.
Materials and methods: In this study, a completely edentulous mandibular acrylic cast (typodont) with bone-level implants placed with the All-on-4 technique served as a reference cast. In this typodont, impressions were taken with the conventional technique and dental stone casts were obtained. In addition, after scanning the acrylic cast in a dental laboratory scanner and obtaining the Standard Tessellation Language (STL) data, 3D printed casts were manufactured with a 3D printing device based on the design. The stone and 3D printed casts were scanned in the laboratory scanner and STL data were obtained, and then the interimplant distances were measured using Geomagic Control X v2020 (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA) analysis software (n = 60). The obtained data were statistically evaluated with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's pairwise comparison tests.
Results: As a result of the one-way ANOVA test, it was determined that the stone casts, 3D printed casts, and reference cast values in all distance intervals conformed to the normal distribution and these values had a significant difference among them in all distance intervals. In Tukey pairwise comparison test, significant differences were found between casts at all distance intervals. In all analyses, the level of significance was determined as .05.
Conclusion: 3D printed casts obtained with a 3D LCD printing device can be an alternative to stone casts when implants are placed in edentulous jaws.
Keywords: Accuracy; All-on-4; Dental implant; Digital dentistry; Three-dimensional printing.
© 2022 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Dec;34(8):1238-1246. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12954. Epub 2022 Aug 17. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022. PMID: 36415927
-
Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Aug;29(8):835-842. doi: 10.1111/clr.13297. Epub 2018 Jun 21. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018. PMID: 29926977
-
Comparing the accuracy of 3D-printed casts versus plaster casts for tooth-supported and implant-supported restorations.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025 Apr 24;22:14. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_382_24. eCollection 2025. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025. PMID: 40351858 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.J Prosthodont. 2022 Jul;31(6):521-528. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13443. Epub 2022 Jan 12. J Prosthodont. 2022. PMID: 34661950
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.J Prosthodont. 2020 Feb;29(2):124-128. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13107. Epub 2019 Sep 9. J Prosthodont. 2020. PMID: 31498957 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of internal structures on the accuracy of 3D printed full-arch dentition preparation models in different printing systems.J Adv Prosthodont. 2023 Jun;15(3):145-154. doi: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.3.145. Epub 2023 Jun 28. J Adv Prosthodont. 2023. PMID: 37441717 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Different Post-Curing Methods on the Degree of Conversion of 3D-Printed Resin for Models in Dentistry.Polymers (Basel). 2024 Feb 18;16(4):549. doi: 10.3390/polym16040549. Polymers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38399926 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. “All-on-Four” immediate-function concept with Brånemark system implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:2–9. - PubMed
-
- Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindström H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:405–414. - PubMed
-
- Bevilacqua M, Tealdo T, Menini M, Pera F, Mossolov A, Drago C, Pera P. The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implant-supported fixed dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105:5–13. - PubMed
-
- Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Botto J. The All-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: A longitudinal study with 10 to 18 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21:565–577. - PubMed
-
- Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Nunes M. The All-on-4 concept for full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxillae: A longitudinal study with 5-13 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21:538–549. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous