Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 4:9:1029813.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1029813. eCollection 2022.

Postprandial lipemic response in dairy-avoiding females following an equal volume of sheep milk relative to cow milk: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Postprandial lipemic response in dairy-avoiding females following an equal volume of sheep milk relative to cow milk: A randomized controlled trial

Fei Teng et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Background: Sheep milk (SM) is an alternate dairy source, which despite many similarities, has both compositional and structural differences in lipids compared to cow milk (CM). Studies are yet to examine the apparent digestibility of SM lipids, relative to CM, and the potential impact on the plasma lipidome.

Objective: To determine the response of the circulatory lipidome to equal volume servings of SM and CM, in females who avoid dairy products.

Method: In a double-blinded, randomized, cross-over trial, self-described dairy avoiding females (n = 30; 24.4 ± 1.1 years) drank SM or CM (650 mL; 33.4 vs. 21.3 g total lipid content; reconstituted from spray dried milk powders) following an overnight fast. Blood samples were collected at fasting and at regular intervals over 4 h after milk consumption. The plasma lipidome was analyzed by LC-MS and fatty acids were quantified by GC-FID.

Results: The overall postprandial triglyceride (TG) response was similar between SM and CM. TG concentrations were comparable at fasting for both groups, however they were higher after CM consumption at 30 min (interaction milk × time p = 0.003), well before any postprandial lipemic response. This was despite greater quantities provided by SM. However, there were notable differences in the postprandial fatty acid response, with SM leading to an increase in short- and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) (C6:0, C8:0, and C10:0) and several long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) (C18:1 t11, c9, t11-CLA, and C20:0; interaction time × milk p < 0.05). This corresponded to a greater postprandial response for medium chain triglycerides (MCTs) C10:0, including TG(10:0/14:0/18:1), TG(16:0/10:0/12:0), and TG(16:0/10:0/14:0) (interaction time × milk p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Despite a higher fat content, SM ingestion resulted in a greater circulating abundance of MCTs, without increasing total postprandial triglyceride response, when compared to CM. The greater abundance and postprandial appearance of MCTs may provide advantageous metabolic responses in children and adults.

Unique identifier and registry: U1111-1209-7768; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375324.

Keywords: adult nutrition; bovine milk; fatty acids; lipid digestion; lipidomics; milk alternative; ovine milk; postprandial lipemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FT, LS, AM, MA, and LD were employed by AgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Center, Palmerston North, New Zealand. AS is employed by AgResearch Ltd., Lincoln Research Center, Lincoln, New Zealand. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Postprandial changes in plasma total triglycerides after SM and CM ingestion. Values presented as means ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 denoted statistical significance (interaction time × milk) between sheep () and cow () milk; α and β denote significant changes (p < 0.05) from baseline after sheep and cow milk ingestion, respectively (Sidak corrected post hocs). SM, sheep milk; CM, cow milk.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Heatmap of postprandial changes in individual TG, DG, MG and ZyE species. Values are presented as mean log fold% changes relative to concentrations at fasting SM (0 min); white represents a 0% change from SM baseline; red represents a 12.5% increase; blue represents and 25% increase; green represents a decrease; α denoted interaction time × milk with postprandial SM abundance greater than CM (p < 0.05), while β denoted postprandial CM abundance is greater than SM (p < 0.05). SM, sheep milk; CM, cow milk; TG, triglyceride; DG, diglyceride; MG, monoglyceride; ZyE, Zymosteryl ester.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Postprandial changes in fatty acids that differed significantly in plasma following ingestion of SM and CM. Values presented as means ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 denoted statistical significance (interaction time × milk) between sheep () and cow () milk; α and β denote significant changes (p < 0.05) from baseline after sheep and cow milk ingestion, respectively (Sidak corrected post hocs). SM, sheep milk; CM, cow milk.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Heat map of postprandial changes in individual plasma fatty acid after SM and CM ingestion. Values are presented as mean log fold % changes relative to concentrations at fasting SM (0 min); white represents a 0% change from SM baseline; red represents a 50% increase; blue represents and 100% increase; green represents a decrease; α denoted interaction time × milk with postprandial SM abundance greater than CM (p < 0.05), while β denoted postprandial CM abundance is greater than SM (p < 0.05). SM, sheep milk; CM, cow milk.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kearney J. Food consumption trends and drivers. Philos T R Soc B. (2010) 365:2793–807. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0149 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zingone F, Bucci C, Iovino P, Ciacci C. Consumption of milk and dairy products: facts and figures. Nutrition. (2017) 33:322–5. 10.1016/j.nut.2016.07.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pal S, Woodford K, Kukuljan S, Ho S. Milk intolerance, beta-casein and lactose. Nutrients. (2015) 7:7285–97. 10.3390/nu7095339 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosensweig NS. Adult human milk intolerance and intestinal lactase deficiency. A review. J Dairy Sci. (1969) 52:585–7. - PubMed
    1. Casellas F, Aparici A, Pérez MJ, Rodríguez P. Perception of lactose intolerance impairs health-related quality of life. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2016) 70:1068–72. 10.1038/ejcn.2016.80 - DOI - PubMed