Multisensory reading promotion in academic libraries
- PMID: 36687914
- PMCID: PMC9845269
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987180
Multisensory reading promotion in academic libraries
Abstract
To confront college students' new reading patterns and the continuous decline in academic library borrowing rates, we conducted empirical research on promoting multisensory reading as a way to attract students' attention, and to stimulate interest in, and promote the practice of, reading through a library program called "Reading Today Listening Everyday" (RTLE) on a library's WeChat public account. The program involved 48 librarians and 105 students who were recruited into different groups to co-create, edit and release multisensory tweets every workday. Multisensory contents including text-based content, audio-based content and emotional resonance were presented to evoke readers' visual, audio, and emotional senses to induce more reading practice. Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) evaluation method, the multisensory presentation in RTLE program was proven to be effective in promoting library reading with a high number of tweeted page views and an increased borrowing rate for recommended books. In 2020, 269 issues accompanied by 269 audio frequencies garnered 80,268 page views, depending on the caliber of the reading promoter out of the 48 librarians and 52 student anchors behind it. The 484 RTLE-recommended books were borrowed 113 times in 2020, which was a rate 1.46 times higher than in 2019 (77 times). The analysis of the relationship between tweet views and borrowing rates for recommended books indicates that more page views indicate greater reader interest, leading to increased borrowing. From readers' feedback and comments, the gain afforded by multisensory reading can improve higher-level reading trends such as the number of reading interests, enjoyment, engagement, etc.
Keywords: academic library; audio; emotional; multisensory reading; reading promotion; visual.
Copyright © 2022 Yu, Jiang, Wu and Cheng.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Empirical study of college students' extracurricular reading preference by functional data analysis of the library book borrowing behavior.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 26;19(1):e0297357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297357. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38277367 Free PMC article.
-
Discussion of Students' E-book Reading Intention With the Integration of Theory of Planned Behavior and Technology Acceptance Model.Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 20;12:752188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752188. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34616348 Free PMC article.
-
An empirical study of college students' reading engagement on academic achievement.Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 10;13:1025754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025754. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36438359 Free PMC article.
-
The Multisensory Experience of Handling and Reading Books.Multisens Res. 2020 Sep 15;33(8):902-928. doi: 10.1163/22134808-bja10015. Multisens Res. 2020. PMID: 33706265 Review.
-
The benefits of library liaison programs for small libraries: an overview.Med Ref Serv Q. 2003 Spring;22(1):21-30. doi: 10.1300/J115v22n01_03. Med Ref Serv Q. 2003. PMID: 12627688 Review.
References
-
- Arora S. (2021). Multisensory Experiences for Art Appreciation: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT.
-
- Bembibre C., Strlič M. (2017). Smell of heritage: a framework for the identification, analysis and archival of historic odours. Herit. Sci. 5, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s40494-016-0114-1 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources