Implementation of a routine outcome monitoring and feedback system for psychotherapy in Argentina: A pilot study
- PMID: 36687943
- PMCID: PMC9850162
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1029164
Implementation of a routine outcome monitoring and feedback system for psychotherapy in Argentina: A pilot study
Abstract
Introduction: Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) has emerged as a strong candidate to improve psychotherapy processes and outcome. However, its use and implementation are greatly understudied in Latin-America. Therefore, the aim of the present pilot study conducted in Argentina was to implement a ROM and feedback system grounded on a psychometrically sound instrument to measure session by session outcome in psychotherapy.
Methods: The sample consisted of 40 patients and 13 therapists. At baseline, the patients completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and they also completed the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-11 before each of the first five sessions. To estimate patient change during the first sessions, we conducted a quantitative analysis using Hierarchical Linear Models. Furthermore, we conducted a qualitative analysis using Consensual Qualitative Research to analyze therapist perception regarding the ROM and feedback system.
Results: Results showed a significant reduction in patients' symptomatic severity during the first five sessions. Additionally, baseline depression significantly predicted the estimated severity at the end of the fifth session. Feedback was given to the therapists after the first four sessions based on these analyses. With regard to the perception of the feedback system, clinicians underlined its usefulness and user-friendly nature. They also mentioned that there was a match between the information provided and their clinical judgment. Furthermore, they provided suggestions to enhance the system that was incorporated in a new and improved version.
Discussion: Limitations and clinical implications are discussed.
Keywords: ROM; baseline characteristics; feedback; monitoring; psychotherapy outcome.
Copyright © 2023 Gómez-Penedo, Manubens, Areas, Fernández-Álvarez, Meglio, Babl, Juan, Ronchi, Muiños, Roussos, Lutz and grosse Holtforth.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Experiences of outcome monitoring in service users with psychosis: Findings from an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies for people with Severe Mental Illness (IAPT-SMI) demonstration site.Br J Clin Psychol. 2017 Sep;56(3):253-272. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12136. Epub 2017 May 11. Br J Clin Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28493592
-
Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of personalized prediction and adaptation tools on treatment outcome in outpatient psychotherapy: study protocol.BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 24;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1464-2. BMC Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28836954 Free PMC article.
-
Motives of Therapists for Using Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and How it is Used by Them in Clinical Practice: Two Qualitative Studies.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jan;52(1):159-170. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01374-2. Epub 2024 Apr 8. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025. PMID: 38589737 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' experiences with routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback systems: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative empirical literature.Psychother Res. 2019 Feb;29(2):157-170. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1326645. Epub 2017 May 19. Psychother Res. 2019. PMID: 28523962
-
Ethical implications of routine outcomes monitoring for patients, psychotherapists, and mental health care systems.Psychotherapy (Chic). 2019 Dec;56(4):459-469. doi: 10.1037/pst0000246. Epub 2019 Oct 3. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2019. PMID: 31580139 Review.
Cited by
-
Implementation of an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in Naturalistic Psychotherapy Settings: Qualitative Insights from Patients, Therapists, and Supervisors Perspectives.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Jul;51(4):439-454. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01362-6. Epub 2024 Mar 26. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024. PMID: 38530511
-
Using the 'Leapfrog' Design as a Simple Form of Adaptive Platform Trial to Develop, Test, and Implement Treatment Personalization Methods in Routine Practice.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Sep;51(5):686-701. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01340-4. Epub 2024 Feb 5. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024. PMID: 38316652 Free PMC article.
-
Routine Outcome Monitoring from Psychotherapists' Perspectives: A Framework Analysis Study of Expected Benefits and Difficulties.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jan;52(1):194-209. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01350-w. Epub 2024 Feb 14. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025. PMID: 38353832 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Press.
-
- Areas M., Roussos A., Hirsch H., Hirsch P., Becerra P., Gómez-Penedo J. M. (2018). Evaluación de un dispositivo de investigación orientada por la práctica para el desarrollo de un sistema de feedback en psicoterapia. Rev. Argentina de Clin. Psicol. 27, 229–249. doi: 10.24205/03276716.2018.1064 - DOI
-
- Barkham M., Lambert M. J. (2021). “The efficacy and effectiveness of psychological therapies,” in Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. eds. Barkham M., Lutz W., Astonguay L. G. C. (Wiley; ), 135–190.
-
- Bates D., Mäechler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI