Identification and Evaluation of Cryptosporidium Species from New York City Cases of Cryptosporidiosis (2015 to 2018): a Watershed Perspective
- PMID: 36688660
- PMCID: PMC9927359
- DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03921-22
Identification and Evaluation of Cryptosporidium Species from New York City Cases of Cryptosporidiosis (2015 to 2018): a Watershed Perspective
Abstract
Watersheds that supply residents with drinking water have the potential for contamination with Cryptosporidium oocysts. To evaluate any potential similarities between Cryptosporidium species previously found in the New York City (NYC) watershed and those causing disease in NYC, the species were identified in stool specimens from residents with cryptosporidiosis. Genetic analysis was performed on 628 positive stool samples collected from NYC residents between 2015 and 2018 to determine the species present. A total of 547 samples yielded positive results by real-time PCR. Of these samples, 512 (93.6%) were identified to the species level, with 94.7% positive for either Cryptosporidium hominis or Cryptosporidium parvum (56.4% and 38.5%, respectively), including one coinfection. Less common Cryptosporidium species identified included C. felis, C. canis, C. ubiquitum, C. meleagridis, and a Cryptosporidium sp. chipmunk genotype. Results were evaluated and compared to species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium previously identified from stormwater collected within the NYC watershed. While there was overlap with some of the rare species found in case specimens, the prevalence and distribution of species did not suggest a connection between sources previously identified in the watershed and the species causing human cases of cryptosporidiosis in NYC residents. IMPORTANCE It is important to identify the species causing human cryptosporidiosis in a population in order to investigate possible sources or routes of contamination. Many species of Cryptosporidium are host-adapted and therefore have the potential to be tracked back to specific sources that can subsequently be managed. There has been no evidence to suggest that the water supply has ever been a source of cryptosporidiosis cases in NYC, and since 2013, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection has further reduced the risk of disease through the use of ultraviolet treatment to inactivate any Cryptosporidium present in the source water. However, as one of the largest unfiltered water supplies in the country, it is important to evaluate watershed sources for potential impacts to public health. In this unique study, species of Cryptosporidium causing disease in NYC residents were identified and compared with previously identified species from the watershed.
Keywords: Cryptosporidium; New York City; cryptosporidiosis; watershed.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Cryptosporidium spp. from small mammals in the New York City watershed.J Wildl Dis. 2007 Oct;43(4):586-96. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-43.4.586. J Wildl Dis. 2007. PMID: 17984253
-
Risk of infection with Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis in dairy cattle in the New York City watershed.Am J Vet Res. 2005 Mar;66(3):413-7. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.413. Am J Vet Res. 2005. PMID: 15822584
-
Patterns of Cryptosporidium oocyst shedding by eastern grey kangaroos inhabiting an Australian watershed.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Oct;71(10):6159-64. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.10.6159-6164.2005. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 16204534 Free PMC article.
-
A review of the molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.Infect Genet Evol. 2022 Mar;98:105212. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2022.105212. Epub 2022 Jan 20. Infect Genet Evol. 2022. PMID: 35065302 Review.
-
Small ruminants and zoonotic cryptosporidiosis.Parasitol Res. 2021 Dec;120(12):4189-4198. doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07116-9. Epub 2021 Mar 13. Parasitol Res. 2021. PMID: 33712929 Review.
Cited by
-
Rodent-adapted Cryptosporidium infection in humans: Seven new cases and review of the literature.One Health. 2024 Jan 20;18:100682. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100682. eCollection 2024 Jun. One Health. 2024. PMID: 39010954 Free PMC article.
-
Host-specific Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in shelter dogs from central Europe.Parasitology. 2024 Apr;151(4):351-362. doi: 10.1017/S003118202400009X. Epub 2024 Feb 2. Parasitology. 2024. PMID: 38305092 Free PMC article.
-
Cryptosporidium and Giardia in cats and dogs: What is the real zoonotic risk?Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2023 Nov 30;4:100158. doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2023.100158. eCollection 2023. Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2023. PMID: 38089689 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevalence and characterization of Cryptosporidium in sika deer from Northern China.Parasite. 2025;32:35. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2025029. Epub 2025 Jun 11. Parasite. 2025. PMID: 40498992 Free PMC article.
-
Cryptosporidium Genomics - Current Understanding, Advances, and Applications.Curr Trop Med Rep. 2024;11(2):92-103. doi: 10.1007/s40475-024-00318-y. Epub 2024 Mar 23. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2024. PMID: 38813571 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ayres Hutter J, Dion R, Irace-Cima A, Fiset M, Guy R, Dixon B, Aguilar JL, Trépanier J, Thivierge K. 2020. Cryptosporidium spp.: human incidence, molecular characterization and associated exposures in Quebec, Canada (2016–2017). PLoS One 15:e0228986. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228986. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical