Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan;35(1):84-104.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.13016. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

Indirect restorative systems-A narrative review

Estevam A Bonfante  1 , Marcelo Calamita  2 , Edmara T P Bergamo  1
Affiliations
Review

Indirect restorative systems-A narrative review

Estevam A Bonfante et al. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The background and clinical understanding of the properties of currently available indirect restorative systems and fabrication methods is, along with manufacturer and evidence-based literature, an important starting point to guide the clinical selection of materials for tooth and/or implant supported reconstructions. Therefore, this review explores most indirect restorative systems available in the market, especially all-ceramic, along with aspects of manufacturing process, clinical survival rates, and esthetic outcomes.

Overview: Progressive incorporation of new technologies in the dental field and advancements in materials science have enabled the development/improvement of indirect restorative systems and treatment concepts in oral rehabilitation, resulting in reliable and predictable workflows and successful esthetic and functional outcomes. Indirect restorative systems have evolved from metal ceramics and polymers to glass ceramics, polycrystalline ceramics, and resin-matrix ceramics, aiming to improve not only biological and mechanical properties, but especially the optical properties and esthetic quality of the reconstructions, in attempt to mimic natural teeth.

Conclusions: Based on several clinical research, materials, and patient-related parameters, a decision tree for the selection of indirect restorative materials was suggested to guide clinicians in the rehabilitation process.

Clinical significance: The pace of materials development is faster than that of clinical research aimed to support their use. Since no single material provides an ideal solution to every case, professionals must continuously seek information from well designed, long-term clinical trials in order to incorporate or not new materials and technological advancements.

Keywords: ceramics; dental implants; dental materials; dental prosthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Nash KD, Pfeifer DL. Prosthodontists in private practice: current and future conditions of practice in the United States (part I). J Prosthodont. 2007;16(4):288-301.
    1. Nash KD, Pfeifer DL. The private practice of prosthodontists: current and future conditions of practice in the United States (part 2). J Prosthodont. 2007;16(5):383-393.
    1. Christensen GJ. Defining oral rehabilitation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(2):215-217.
    1. Muhlemann S, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hammerle CHF, Sailer I. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Part II: time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):252-257.
    1. Mello CC, Lemos CAA, de Luna Gomes JM, Verri FR, Pellizzer EP. CAD/CAM vs conventional technique for fabrication of implant-supported frameworks: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(2):182-192.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources