Outcomes of remote versus face-to-face ear, nose and throat outpatient consultation on patient pathways
- PMID: 36688846
- PMCID: PMC10313455
- DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0144
Outcomes of remote versus face-to-face ear, nose and throat outpatient consultation on patient pathways
Abstract
Introduction: Remote consultation has potential benefits in increasing patient pathway efficiency and has been found to reduce costs and carbon emissions. Previous studies of remote consultation in ear, nose and throat (ENT) practice have reported mixed results and used relatively small sample sizes. The aim of this article is to study the impact of remote telephone consultation on ENT clinic outcomes and pathway efficiency, compared with in-person review, within new and follow-up patient cohorts and subspeciality, where previous studies demonstrate mixed and inconclusive results.
Methods: This was a comparison of remote clinic appointment outcomes over a 2-month period from a single ENT referral centre (426) with an equivalent data set of face-to-face clinic appointments over a similar time frame (1,533). Statistical analysis included chi-squared test for clinic outcomes and two-sample t-squared test for mean hand-off between both cohorts (p < 0.05).
Results: For new referrals, remote consultation was associated with statistically significantly greater rates of follow-up (p < 0.00001), investigation (p = 0.00251) and hand-off (p < 0.00013) than patients seen face-to-face - particularly where presenting with head and neck symptoms. For follow-up patients, remote consultation had similar rates of investigation (p = 0.11071) or further follow-up (p = 0.08) and mean hand-off (p < 0.11764) to those seen face-to-face.
Conclusions: Remote consultation in ENT could become the norm for follow-up patients, but should be used with caution in the initial consultation of new patients.
Keywords: ENT; Efficiency; Follow-up; Hand-off; Remote consultation.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Follow-up arrangements in head and neck cancer clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from two tertiary UK head and neck cancer centres.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Aug;105(S2):S60-S68. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0283. Epub 2021 Dec 23. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023. PMID: 34941427 Free PMC article.
-
Senior triaging of ENT emergency clinic referrals alleviates pressures on the outpatient department.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022 Feb;104(2):117-120. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0068. Epub 2021 Nov 23. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022. PMID: 34813383 Free PMC article.
-
Virtual outreach: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of joint teleconferenced medical consultations.Health Technol Assess. 2004 Dec;8(50):1-106, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta8500. Health Technol Assess. 2004. PMID: 15546515 Review.
-
A systematic review of outcomes of remote consultation in ENT.Clin Otolaryngol. 2021 Jul;46(4):699-719. doi: 10.1111/coa.13768. Epub 2021 Mar 29. Clin Otolaryngol. 2021. PMID: 33754458
-
Telephone consultation for two-week-wait ENT and head and neck cancer referrals: initial evaluation including patient satisfaction.J Laryngol Otol. 2022 Jul;136(7):615-621. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121003157. Epub 2021 Oct 26. J Laryngol Otol. 2022. PMID: 34698005
Cited by
-
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Metaverse: Applications, Challenges, and Future Prospects.Curr Med Sci. 2024 Dec;44(6):1113-1122. doi: 10.1007/s11596-024-2960-5. Epub 2024 Dec 14. Curr Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39673002 Review.
References
-
- Gupta T, Gkiousias V, Bhutta M. A systematic review of outcomes of remote consultation in ENT. Clin Otolaryngol 2021; 46: 699–719. - PubMed
-
- Tysome J, Bhutta M. COVID-19: protecting our ENT workforce. Clin Otolaryngol 2020; 45: 311–312. - PubMed
-
- Royal College of Surgeons. COVID-19: Good Practice For Surgeons And Surgical Teams. London: Royal College of Surgeons; 2020.
-
- Garritano F, Goldenberg D. Successful telemedicine programs in otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2011; 44: 1259–1274. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous