Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 14;29(14):2573-2579.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3348.

Considerations for Drug Development in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Affiliations

Considerations for Drug Development in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Mikkael A Sekeres et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have historically been challenging diseases for drug development due to their biology, preclinical modeling, and the affected patient population. In April 2022, the FDA convened a panel of regulators and academic experts in MDS to discuss approaches to improve MDS drug development. The panel reviewed challenges in MDS clinical trial design and endpoints and outlined considerations for future trial design in MDS to facilitate drug development to meaningfully meet patient needs. Challenges for defining clinical benefit in patients with MDS include cumbersome response criteria, standardized transfusion thresholds, and application and validation of patient reported outcome instruments. Clinical trials should reflect the biology of disease evolution, the advanced age of patients with MDS, and how patients are treated in real-world settings to maximize the likelihood of identifying active drugs. In patients with lower-risk disease, response criteria for anemic patients should be based on baseline transfusion dependency, improvement in symptoms, and quality of life. For higher-risk patients with MDS, trials should include guidance to prevent dose reductions or delays that could limit efficacy, specify minimal durations of treatment (in the absence of toxicity or progression), and have endpoints focused on overall survival and durable responses. MDS trials should be designed from the outset to allow the practicable application of new therapies in this high-needs population, with drugs that can be administered and tolerated in community settings, and with endpoints that meaningfully improve patients' lives over existing therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
FDA approvals for MDS over time

References

    1. Celgene. VIDAZA (azacitidine) [drug label].U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/021790s025lbl.pdf. Revised May 2022. Accessed July 25, 2022.
    1. Celgene. REVLIMID (lenalidomide) [drug label].U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/021880s065lbl.pdf. Revised May 2022. Accessed July 25, 2022.
    1. Otsuka. DACOGEN (decitabine) [drug label]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/021790s025lbl.pdf, Revised June 29, 2020. Accessed November 1, 2021.
    1. Celgene. REBLOYZYL (luspatercept-aamt) [drug label].U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/761136s006lbl.pdf. Revised July 2022. Accessed July 25, 2022.
    1. Otsuka. INQOVI (decitabine and cedazuridine tablets) [drug label]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/212576s000lbl.pdf. Revised July 7, 2020. Accessed January 26, 2022.