Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 21:9:e43652.
doi: 10.2196/43652.

Decisions and Decisional Needs of Canadians From all Provinces and Territories During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Population-Based Cross-sectional Surveys

Dawn Stacey  1   2 , Claire Ludwig  3 , Patrick Archambault  4   5   6 , Maureen Smith  3   7 , Monica Taljaard  2   8 , Meg Carley  2 , Karine Plourde  4 , Laura Boland  2 , Amédé Gogovor  6 , Ian Graham  2   8 , Daniel Kobewka  2   9   10 , Robert K D McLean  11 , Michelle L A Nelson  12   13 , Brandi Vanderspank-Wright  1   2 , France Légaré  4   6
Affiliations

Decisions and Decisional Needs of Canadians From all Provinces and Territories During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Population-Based Cross-sectional Surveys

Dawn Stacey et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

Background: Never before COVID-19 had Canadians faced making health-related decisions in a context of significant uncertainty. However, little is known about which type of decisions and the types of difficulties that they faced.

Objective: We sought to identify the health-related decisions and decisional needs of Canadians.

Methods: Our study was codesigned by researchers and knowledge users (eg, patients, clinicians). Informed by the CHERRIES (the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys) reporting guideline, we conducted 2 online surveys of random samples drawn from the Leger consumer panel of 400,000 Canadians. Eligible participants were adults (≥18 years) who received or were receiving any health services in the past 12 months for themselves (adults) or for their child (parent) or senior with cognitive impairment (caregiver). We assessed decisions and decisional needs using questions informed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, including decisional conflict and decision regret using the Decision Conflict Scale (DCS) and the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), respectively. Descriptive statistics were conducted for adults who had decided for themselves or on behalf of someone else. Significant decisional conflict (SDC) was defined as a total DCS score of >37.5 out of 100, and significant decision regret was defined as a total DRS score of >25 out of 100.

Results: From May 18 to June 4, 2021, 14,459 adults and 6542 parents/caregivers were invited to participate. The invitation view rate was 15.5% (2236/14,459) and 28.3% (1850/6542); participation rate, 69.3% (1549/2236) and 28.7% (531/1850); and completion rate, 97.3% (1507/1549) and 95.1% (505/531), respectively. The survey was completed by 1454 (97.3%) adults and 438 (95.1%) parents/caregivers in English (1598/1892, 84.5%) or French (294/1892, 15.5%). Respondents from all 10 Canadian provinces and the northern territories represented a range of ages, education levels, civil statuses, ethnicities, and annual household income. Of 1892 respondents, 541 (28.6%) self-identified as members of marginalized groups. The most frequent decisions were (adults vs parents/caregivers) as follows: COVID-19 vaccination (490/1454, 33.7%, vs 87/438, 19.9%), managing a health condition (253/1454, 17.4%, vs 47/438, 10.7%), other COVID-19 decisions (158/1454, 10.9%, vs 85/438, 19.4%), mental health care (128/1454, 8.8%, vs 27/438, 6.2%), and medication treatments (115/1454, 7.9%, vs 23/438, 5.3%). Caregivers also reported decisions about moving family members to/from nursing or retirement homes (48/438, 11.0%). Adults (323/1454, 22.2%) and parents/caregivers (95/438, 21.7%) had SDC. Factors making decisions difficult were worrying about choosing the wrong option (557/1454, 38.3%, vs 184/438, 42.0%), worrying about getting COVID-19 (506/1454, 34.8%, vs 173/438, 39.5%), public health restrictions (427/1454, 29.4%, vs 158/438, 36.1%), information overload (300/1454, 20.6%, vs 77/438, 17.6%), difficulty separating misinformation from scientific evidence (297/1454, 20.4%, vs 77/438, 17.6%), and difficulty discussing decisions with clinicians (224/1454, 15.4%, vs 51/438, 11.6%). For 1318 (90.6%) adults and 366 (83.6%) parents/caregivers who had decided, 353 (26.8%) and 125 (34.2%) had significant decision regret, respectively. In addition, 1028 (50%) respondents made their decision alone without considering the opinions of clinicians.

Conclusions: During COVID-19, Canadians who responded to the survey faced several new health-related decisions. Many reported unmet decision-making needs, resulting in SDC and decision regret. Interventions can be designed to address their decisional needs and support patients facing new health-related decisions.

Keywords: COVID-19; caregivers; decision regret; decisional conflict; health care; health care decisions; health outcome; older adults; pandemic preparedness; parents; public health decision; public health policy; shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cross-sectional survey recruitment of Canadians during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of Canadian cross-sectional survey respondents with clinical SDC>37.5 out of 100 during the COVID-19 pandemic. CA $1=US $0.74. DCS: Decisional Conflict Scale; LGBTQ+: lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, transgender, queer, two-spirited, questioning; SDC: significant decisional conflict.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Carley S, Horner D, Body R, Mackway-Jones K. Evidence-based medicine and COVID-19: what to believe and when to change. Emerg Med J. 2020 Sep 10;37(9):572–575. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210098.emermed-2020-210098 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abrams EM, Shaker M, Oppenheimer J, Davis RS, Bukstein DA, Greenhawt M. The challenges and opportunities for shared decision making highlighted by COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Sep;8(8):2474–2480.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.003. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32679348 S2213-2198(20)30699-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong A, Bhyat R, Srivastava S, Boissé Lomax L, Appireddy R. Patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic: use of virtual care. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 21;23(1):e20621. doi: 10.2196/20621. https://www.jmir.org/2021/1/e20621/ v23i1e20621 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatia RS, Chu C, Pang A, Tadrous M, Stamenova V, Cram P. Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open. 2021 Feb 17;9(1):E107–E114. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200311. http://cmajopen.ca/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=33597307 9/1/E107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hohl CM, Rosychuk RJ, Hau JP, Hayward J, Landes M, Yan JW, Ting DK, Welsford M, Archambault PM, Mercier E, Chandra K, Davis P, Vaillancourt S, Leeies M, Small S, Morrison LJ, Canadian COVID-19 Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) investigators for the Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers‚ for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group Treatments, resource utilization, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients presenting to emergency departments across pandemic waves: an observational study by the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) CJEM. 2022 Jun 01;24(4):397–407. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00275-3. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/35362857 10.1007/s43678-022-00275-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Grants and funding