Robotic pelvic side-wall lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: a systematic review of videos and application of the IDEAL 2A framework
- PMID: 36689077
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01526-w
Robotic pelvic side-wall lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: a systematic review of videos and application of the IDEAL 2A framework
Abstract
Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in rectal cancer has gained increasing traction worldwide. Robotic LPLND is an emerging technique. Utilising the IDEAL (idea, development, exploration, assessment and long-term follow-up) framework for surgical innovation, robotic LPLND is currently at the IDEAL 2A stage (development) mainly limited to case reports, case series and videos. A systematic literature review was performed for videographic robotic LPLND. Pubmed, Ovid and Web of Science were searched with a predefined search strategy. The LapVEGAS score for peer review of video surgery was adapted for the robotic approach (RoVEGAS) and applied to measure video quality. Two reviewers independently reviewed videos and consensus reached on technical steps and learning points. Data are presented as a narrative synthesis of results. The IDEAL 2A framework was applied to videos to assess their content at the present stage of innovation. A total of 83 abstracts were identified. In accordance with the PRISMA statement, nine videos were analysed. Adherence to the complete IDEAL 2a framework was low. All videos demonstrated LPLND; however, reporting of clinical outcomes was heterogeneous and completed in six of nine videos. Histopathology was reported in six videos, with other outcomes variably reported. No videos presented patient-reported outcome measures. Two videos reported presence or absence of recurrence on follow-up. Video articles provide a valuable educational resource in dissemination and adoption of robotic techniques. Standardisation of reporting objectives are needed. Complete reporting of pathology and oncologic outcomes is required in videographic procedural-based publications to meet the IDEAL 2A framework criteria.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection; Robotic surgery.
© 2023. Crown.
Similar articles
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3520-3530. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10901-z. Epub 2024 May 30. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38816620
-
A prospective phase II clinical trial/IDEAL Stage 2a series of single-port robotic colorectal surgery for abdominal and transanal cases.Colorectal Dis. 2023 Dec;25(12):2335-2345. doi: 10.1111/codi.16788. Epub 2023 Oct 31. Colorectal Dis. 2023. PMID: 37907449 Clinical Trial.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1251-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Mar 10. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 19297079
-
Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review.Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):266-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.028. Epub 2012 Aug 23. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 22940173
Cited by
-
Recommendations for Image and Video Articles in Scholarly Publishing.J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Feb 10;40(5):e84. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e84. J Korean Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 39938874 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ogura A, Konishi T, Cunningham C (2019) Neoadjuvant (Chemo)radiotherapy with total mesorectal excision only is not sufficient to prevent lateral local recurrence in enlarged nodes: results of the multicenter lateral node study of patients with low cT3/4 rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 37(1):33–43. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.00032 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Matthews J, Palmer L, Maw A (2020) Meta-analysis of survival and functional outcomes after total mesorectal excision with or without lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer surgery. Surgery 168(3):486–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.063 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kim HJ, Choi G-S, Park JS, Park SY, Lee HJ, Woo IT et al (2018) Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 32(5):2466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5948-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y, Furutani A et al (2018) Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 32(11):4498–4505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6197-x - DOI - PubMed
-
- McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374(9695):1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources