Endocervical sampling using brush versus curette: a single centre experience and literature review
- PMID: 36689210
- DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2162866
Endocervical sampling using brush versus curette: a single centre experience and literature review
Abstract
Endocervical sampling is performed traditionally with an endocervical curette (ECC). The current study objective is to compare the histopathological performance of endocervical brush (ECB) and endocervical curette (ECC). A retrospective review was performed including patients included that underwent colposcopy with endocervical sampling using either method. A total of 127 samples were obtained with ECC and 98 with ECB. Histopathological diagnosis was obtained in 124 (97.6%) ECC samples and in 94 (95.9%) ECB samples (p = 0.46). The incidence of benign results was similar between ECC and ECB (117 (92.1%) versus 88 (89.8%) respectively (p = 0.28)). When combining information from endocervical sampling with cervical biopsies, the detection rate of high-grade pathologies was similar between the groups with 14 cases (17.7%) for ECC and 8 cases (17.0%) for ECB (p = 0.43). A scope review of the topic was performed, illustrating that studies favour either method. In conclusion, ECB and ECC perform similarly for providing a histopathological diagnosis on endocervical samples.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Endocervical samples in colposcopy were traditionally obtained using an endocervical curette. Similarly, a brush can be used for histological sampling of the endocervical canal. However, it is unclear how the ability to obtain a histopathological diagnosis compares between the two techniques.What do the results of this study add? This single-institution experience with using endocervical brush and curette for endocervical sampling finds that both methods are acceptable and have a high ability to provide a histopathological diagnosis. Precisely, 4.1% of brush and 2.4% of curette samples had insufficient tissue.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and further research? The endocervical brush is an adequate sampling method for colposcopy, and can be safely used instead of the curette, based on clinician preference. Further studies could investigate how these methods compare from a patient perspective.
Keywords: Colposcopy; colposcopic exam; endocervical brush; endocervical curettage; endocervix; histopathological diagnosis; insufficient sampling.
Similar articles
-
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of the endocervical brush after endocervical curettage.Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):715-7. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00470-5. Obstet Gynecol. 1997. PMID: 9351750 Clinical Trial.
-
Endocervical curetting vs. endocervical brushing as case finding methods.Diagn Cytopathol. 2006 May;34(5):313-6. doi: 10.1002/dc.20448. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006. PMID: 16604549
-
Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?J Reprod Med. 1988 Aug;33(8):677-83. J Reprod Med. 1988. PMID: 3172071
-
Endocervical curettage at the time of colposcopic assessment of the uterine cervix.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005 May;60(5):315-20. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000160774.92271.48. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005. PMID: 15841025 Review.
-
To ECC or not to ECC: the question remains.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008 Dec;35(4):583-97; viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.09.007. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008. PMID: 19061818 Review.