Question prompt lists and caregiver question asking in pediatric specialty appointments: A randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 36689884
- PMCID: PMC9931668
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.107620
Question prompt lists and caregiver question asking in pediatric specialty appointments: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: Question prompt lists (QPLs) have been effective at increasing patient involvement and question asking in medical appointments, which is critical for shared decision making. We investigated whether pre-visit preparation (PVP), including a QPL, would increase question asking among caregivers of pediatric patients with undiagnosed, suspected genetic conditions.
Methods: Caregivers were randomized to receive the PVP before their appointment (n = 59) or not (control, n = 53). Appointments were audio-recorded. Transcripts were analyzed to determine questions asked.
Results: Caregivers in the PVP group asked more questions (MeanPVP = 4.36, SDPVP = 4.66 vs. Meancontrol = 2.83, SDcontrol = 3.03, p = 0.045), including QPL questions (MeanPVP = 1.05, SDPVP = 1.39 vs. Meancontrol = 0.36, SDcontrol = 0.81, p = 0.002). Caregivers whose child had insurance other than Medicaid in the PVP group asked more total and QPL questions than their counterparts in the control group (ps = 0.005 and 0.002); there was no intervention effect among caregivers of children with Medicaid or no insurance (ps = 0.775 and 0.166).
Conclusion: The PVP increased question asking but worked less effectively among traditionally underserved groups. Additional interventions, including provider-focused efforts, may be needed to promote engagement of underserved patients.
Practice implications: Patient/family-focused interventions may not be beneficial for all populations. Providers should be aware of potential implicit and explicit biases and encourage question asking to promote patient/family engagement.
Keywords: Genetic conditions; Patient engagement; Patient-provider communication; Pediatrics; Question prompt lists.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1982. Making Health Care Decisions. The Ethical and Legal Implications of Informed Consent in the Patient-Practitioner Relationship. Washington, DC.
-
- Babac A, von Friedrichs V, Litzkendorf S, Zeidler J, Damm K, & Graf von der Schulenburg J. Integrating patient perspectives in medical decision-making: a qualitative interview study examining potentials within the rare disease information exchange process in practice. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2019;19:1–17. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Pérez-Ramos J, Abt-Sacks A, Perestelo-Pérez L, Rivero-Santana A, Toledo-Chávarri A, González N, & Serrano-Aguilar P, Shared decision making in rare diseases: an overview. Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs. 2015; 2:39–44.
-
- Shen MJ, Peterson EB, Costas-Muñiz R, Hernandez MH, Jewell ST, Matsoukas K, Bylund CL. The Effects of Race and Racial Concordance on Patient-Physician Communication: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018;5:117–40. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0350-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
