Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;17(1):112-121.
doi: 10.14444/8390. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique

Affiliations

Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique

Ian J Wellington et al. Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The prone transpsoas (PTP) approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a relatively novel technique. Currently, little is known about its associated complications and early patient-reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of LLIF performed via the PTP approach on sagittal radiographic parameters, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and rates of complications.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 82 consecutive patients who underwent LLIF via a PTP technique. Lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), anterior disc height (ADH), and posterior disc height (PDH) were measured on preoperative, initial postoperative, and 3-month postoperative radiographs. PROMs including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); the visual analog scale (VAS); and pain portions of the EQ5D, VAS back, and VAS leg ratings were collected at the preoperative and subsequent postoperative visits. Length of hospital stay and postoperative complications related to the procedure were recorded.

Results: Significant improvements were seen at the initial (4.5° ± 8.6°, P < 0.001) and 3-month (4.4° ± 7.2°, P < 0.001) postoperative periods for LL, as well as SL (6.8° ± 4.8°, P < 0.001; 6.7° ± 4.4°, P < 0.001), ADH (8.0 mm ± 3.6, P < 0.001; 7.4 mm ± 3.6, P < 0.001), and PDH (3.3 mm ± 2.4, P < 0.001; 3.1 mm ± 2.5, P < 0.001). Significant improvements were seen at 3 months postoperatively for ODI (P < 0.001), EQ5D pain (P = 0.016), VAS leg (P < 0.001), and VAS back (P < 0.001). The average length of stay was 2.7 ± 4.5 days. The most common complications were ipsilateral thigh pain/numbness (45.1%), ipsilateral hip flexor weakness (39.0%), and contralateral thigh pain/numbness (14.6%).

Conclusions: While early PROMs and correction of sagittal radiographic parameters show promising results for the PTP approach for LLIF, it is not without risks.

Clinical relevance: PTP interbody fusion is an emerging technique that allows for simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns of the lumbar spine. This early case series demonstrates significant improvement in functional outcomes and lumbar lordosis with a safety profile comparable to other well-established techniques.

Keywords: complications; lateral; lumbar; outcomes; prone; psoas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: Hardeep Singh and Isaac Moss are paid consultants for Alphatec.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraoperative images depicting standard prone patient positioning. Pads placed below the axillae and around the hip induce a convex bend in the patient’s abdomen, opening up the near side of the disc space.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of sagittal radiographic parameters collected.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Function global rating of change (GROC) scores at 2 wk, 6 wk, and 3 mo from surgery.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pain global rating of change (GROC) scores at 2 wk, 6 wk, and 3 mo from surgery.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) scores at 2 wk, 6 wk, and 3 mo from surgery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Campbell PG, Nunley PD, Cavanaugh D, et al. . Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;44(1):E6. 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17566 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGowan JE, Kanter AS. Lateral approaches for the surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 2019;30(3):313–322. 10.1016/j.nec.2019.02.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taba HA, Williams SK. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2020;31(1):33–42. 10.1016/j.nec.2019.08.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goyal A, Kerezoudis P, Alvi MA, Goncalves S, Bydon M. Outcomes following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion for degenerative low grade lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;167:122–128. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.02.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lehmen JA, Gerber EJ. Mis lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics. Eur Spine J. 2015;24 Suppl 3(3):287–313. 10.1007/s00586-015-3886-1 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources