Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;37(5):3796-3806.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09881-3. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

Comparison of endoscopic full-thickness resection and ligation-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria

Affiliations

Comparison of endoscopic full-thickness resection and ligation-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria

Lei Gu et al. Surg Endosc. 2023 May.

Abstract

Background: In the treatment of small gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria (SET-MPs), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has been an effective procedure and ligation-assisted EFTR (EFTR-L) seems a feasible and promising operation. We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of EFTR-L and EFTR to evaluate effect and safety of either method in the treatment of small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric SET-MPs.

Methods: Between January 2018 to May 2022, we retrospectively enrolled a total of 119 patients with gastric SET-MPs treated by EFTR-L (79 patients) or EFTR (40 patients) at Xiangya Hospital Central South University. Clinical characteristics, operation efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and operation cost were compared between the 2 groups. Univariate and multiple logistic and linear regressions were applied to analyze the therapeutic outcomes of the procedure, and covariates were adjusted in the multiple analysis.

Results: The operation time of EFTR-L group (16.34 ± 5.75 min) was significantly shorter than EFTR group (51.23 ± 21.21 min, P < 0.001), and the difference remained significant after adjusting the covariates (adjusted mean difference, 30.56; 95% confidence interval, 25.65-35.47; P < 0.001). The operation cost of EFTR-L group was lower than EFTR group (1268.52 ± 457.22 vs 1643.18 ± 295.08 $; P < 0.001). The complete resection rate of the EFTR-L group was 98.72% and of the EFTR group 100%. The incidence of abdominal pain in the EFTR-L group (5.06%) was lower than in the EFTR group (27.50%, P = 0.008). A patient in the EFTR group underwent severe pneumoperitoneum and received abdominocentesis during operation. One case of peritonitis occurred in the EFTR-L group but recovered from intensified antibiotic therapy. No delayed blood or perforation occurred.

Conclusions: Compared to EFTR, EFTR-L might be a feasible procedure for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric SET-MPs due to the acceptable efficacy, shorter operation time, and lower cost.

Keywords: Endoscopic full-thickness resection; Gastric subepithelial tumors; Ligation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kim GH (2012) Endoscopic resection of subepithelial tumors. Clin Endosc 45:240–244. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.3.240 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Zhang D, Lin Q, Shi R (2018) Ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection with apical mucosal incision to treat gastric subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Endoscopy 50:1180–1185. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0625-6326 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Faulx A, Kothari S, Acosta RD (2017) The role of endoscopy in subepithelial lesions of the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 85:1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deprez PH, Moons LMG, OʼToole D, et al (2022) Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 54:412–429. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1751-5742 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cai MY, Zhou PH, Yao LQ (2012) Current status of endoscopic resection in China. Dig Endosc 24:166–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01268.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources