Comparison of endoscopic full-thickness resection and ligation-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria
- PMID: 36690893
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09881-3
Comparison of endoscopic full-thickness resection and ligation-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria
Abstract
Background: In the treatment of small gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria (SET-MPs), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has been an effective procedure and ligation-assisted EFTR (EFTR-L) seems a feasible and promising operation. We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of EFTR-L and EFTR to evaluate effect and safety of either method in the treatment of small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric SET-MPs.
Methods: Between January 2018 to May 2022, we retrospectively enrolled a total of 119 patients with gastric SET-MPs treated by EFTR-L (79 patients) or EFTR (40 patients) at Xiangya Hospital Central South University. Clinical characteristics, operation efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and operation cost were compared between the 2 groups. Univariate and multiple logistic and linear regressions were applied to analyze the therapeutic outcomes of the procedure, and covariates were adjusted in the multiple analysis.
Results: The operation time of EFTR-L group (16.34 ± 5.75 min) was significantly shorter than EFTR group (51.23 ± 21.21 min, P < 0.001), and the difference remained significant after adjusting the covariates (adjusted mean difference, 30.56; 95% confidence interval, 25.65-35.47; P < 0.001). The operation cost of EFTR-L group was lower than EFTR group (1268.52 ± 457.22 vs 1643.18 ± 295.08 $; P < 0.001). The complete resection rate of the EFTR-L group was 98.72% and of the EFTR group 100%. The incidence of abdominal pain in the EFTR-L group (5.06%) was lower than in the EFTR group (27.50%, P = 0.008). A patient in the EFTR group underwent severe pneumoperitoneum and received abdominocentesis during operation. One case of peritonitis occurred in the EFTR-L group but recovered from intensified antibiotic therapy. No delayed blood or perforation occurred.
Conclusions: Compared to EFTR, EFTR-L might be a feasible procedure for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric SET-MPs due to the acceptable efficacy, shorter operation time, and lower cost.
Keywords: Endoscopic full-thickness resection; Gastric subepithelial tumors; Ligation.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic full-thickness resection with defect closure using an over-the-scope clip for gastric subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria.Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3356-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4076-2. Epub 2015 Feb 21. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25701060 Free PMC article.
-
Facilitating endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors with a novel snare traction method (with video).J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Mar;39(3):535-543. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16428. Epub 2023 Nov 27. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024. PMID: 38011894
-
The application of endoscopic loop ligation in defect repair following endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan;57(1):119-123. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1981994. Epub 2021 Dec 2. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 34854324
-
Current Status of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: A Literature Review Over Two Decades.Digestion. 2023;104(6):415-429. doi: 10.1159/000530679. Epub 2023 Jul 7. Digestion. 2023. PMID: 37423206
-
Endoscopic treatments for small gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria layer.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 28;21(32):9503-11. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9503. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26327758 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Present situation of minimally invasive surgical treatment for early gastric cancer.World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Apr 15;16(4):1154-1165. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1154. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38660633 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endoscopic full-thickness resection vs surgical resection for gastric stromal tumors: Efficacy and safety using propensity score matching.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):101002. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101002. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025. PMID: 40162396 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kim GH (2012) Endoscopic resection of subepithelial tumors. Clin Endosc 45:240–244. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.3.240 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Zhang D, Lin Q, Shi R (2018) Ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection with apical mucosal incision to treat gastric subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Endoscopy 50:1180–1185. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0625-6326 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Faulx A, Kothari S, Acosta RD (2017) The role of endoscopy in subepithelial lesions of the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 85:1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.022 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Deprez PH, Moons LMG, OʼToole D, et al (2022) Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 54:412–429. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1751-5742 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cai MY, Zhou PH, Yao LQ (2012) Current status of endoscopic resection in China. Dig Endosc 24:166–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01268.x - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical