Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 6;12(9):e052687.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052687.

Systematic evidence map of evidence addressing the top 10 priority research questions for hyperemesis gravidarum

Caitlin Rosa Dean  1   2 , Kelly Nijsten  3 , René Spijker  4 , Margaret O'Hara  2 , Tessa J Roseboom  3   4 , Rebecca C Painter  3
Affiliations

Systematic evidence map of evidence addressing the top 10 priority research questions for hyperemesis gravidarum

Caitlin Rosa Dean et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Knowledge gaps regarding hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) are substantial. We aimed to systematically identify and map recent evidence addressing the top 10 priority questions for HG, as published in 2021 in a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

Design: Systematic evidence map.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE on 12 January 2021 and CINAHL on 22 February 2021 with search terms hyperemesis gravidarum, pernicious vomiting in pregnancy and their synonyms. Results were limited to 2009 onwards. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts to assess whether the studies addressed a top 10 priority questions for HG. Differences were discussed until consensus was reached. Publications were allocated to one or more top 10 research questions. Study design was noted, as was patient or public involvement. Two reviewers extracted data synchronously and both cross-checked 10%. Extracted data were imported into EPPI-Reviewer software to create an evidence map.

Outcome measures: The number and design of studies in the search yield, displayed per the published 10 priority questions.

Results: Searches returned 4338 results for screening; 406 publications were included in the evidence map. 136 publications addressed multiple questions. Numerous studies address the immediate and long-term outcomes or possible markers for HG (question 8 and 9, respectively 164 and 82 studies). Very few studies seek a possible cure for HG (question 1, 8 studies), preventative treatment (question 4, 2 studies) or how to achieve nutritional requirements of pregnancy (question 10, 17 studies). Case reports/series were most numerous with 125 (30.7%) included. Few qualitative studies (9, 2.2%) were identified. 25 (6.1%) systematic reviews addressed eight questions, or aspects of them. 31 (7.6%) studies included patient involvement.

Conclusions: There are significant gaps and overlap in the current HG literature addressing priority questions. Researchers and funders should direct their efforts at addressing the gaps in the top 10 questions.

Keywords: Maternal medicine; OBSTETRICS; Prenatal diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart of inclusions and exclusions. HG, hyperemesis gravidarum.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bubble map charting the available evidence according to the question it relates to, the study design and the involvement of patient and public involvement. HG, hyperemesis gravidarum.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The number of studies identified per top 10 question included in the evidence map for hyperemesis gravidarum.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Einarson TR, Piwko C, Koren G. Quantifying the global rates of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a meta analysis. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol 2013;20:e171–83. - PubMed
    1. Dean CR, Shemar M, Ostrowski GAU, et al. Management of severe pregnancy sickness and hyperemesis gravidarum. BMJ 2018;363:410–2. 10.1136/bmj.k5000 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dean C, Bannigan K, Marsden J. Reviewing the effect of hyperemesis gravidarum on women’s lives and mental health. Br J Midwifery 2018;26:109–19.
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . The management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2016.
    1. MacGibbon K, Fejzo M, Mullin P. Mortality secondary to hyperemesis gravidarum: a case report. Women’s Health & Gynecology 2015;1. [Online at:http://scientonline.org/open-access/mortality-secondary-to-hyperemesis-g...

LinkOut - more resources