Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;54(1):39-61.
doi: 10.1111/sifp.12227. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

Validation of the Fertility Norms Scale and Association with Fertility Intention and Contraceptive Use in India

Affiliations

Validation of the Fertility Norms Scale and Association with Fertility Intention and Contraceptive Use in India

Nandita Bhan et al. Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Social norms related to fertility may be driving pregnancy desire, timing and contraceptive use, but measurement has lagged. We validated a 10-item injunctive Fertility Norms Scale (FNS) and examined its associations with family planning outcomes among 1021 women and 1020 men in India. FNS captured expectations around pronatalism, childbearing early in marriage and community pressure. We assessed reliability and construct validity through Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) respectively, examining associations with childbearing intention and contraceptive use. FNS demonstrated good reliability (α = 0.65-0.71) and differing sub-constructs by gender. High fertility norm among women was associated with greater likelihood of pregnancy intention [RRR = 2.35 (95% CI: 1.25,4.39); ARRR = 1.53 (95% CI: 0.70,3.30)], lower likelihood of delaying pregnancy [RRR = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.50,0.96); ARRR = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.51,1.02)] and greater ambivalence on delaying pregnancy [RRR = 1.92 (95% CI: 1.18,3.14); ARRR = 1.99 (95% CI: 1.21,3.28)]. Women's higher FNS scores were also associated with higher sterilization [RRR = 2.17 (95% CI: 1.28,3.66); ARRR = 2.24 (95% CI: 1.32,3.83)], but the reverse was noted for men [RRR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.36,1.04); ARRR = 0.54 (95% CI: 0.32,0.94)]. FNS indicated better predictive value among women compared to men for key reproductive outcomes. This measure may be useful for social norms-focused evaluations in family planning and warrants cross-contextual study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. High-Impact Practices in Family Planning. 2018. Engaging Men and Boys in Family Planning: A Strategic Planning Guide. Washington, DC: USAID.
    1. Adams Melissa K., Salazar Elizabeth, and Lundgren Rebecka. 2013. “Tell Them You are Planning for the Future: Gender Norms and Family Planning among Adolescents in Northern Uganda.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 123: e7–e10. - PubMed
    1. Agha Sohail, Morgan Brooks, Archer Helena, Paul Shadae, Babigumira Joseph B., and Guthrie Brandon L.. 2021. “Understanding How Social Norms Affect Modern Contraceptive Use.” BMC Public Health 21(1): 1–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhan Nandita, Sodhi Chhavi, Achyut Pranita, Edwin Elizabeth Thomas Abhishek Gautam, and Raj Anita. 2022. Mother-in-Law’s Influence on Family Planning Decision-Making and Contraceptive Use: A Review of Evidence. Center on Gender Equity and Health, UC San Diego.
    1. Bhan Nandita, Thomas Edwin, Dixit Anvita, Averbach Sarah, Dey Arnab, Rao Namratha, Lundgren Rebecka L., Silverman Jay, and Raj Anita. 2020. Measuring Women’s Agency and Gender Norms in Family Planning: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? Center on Gender Equity and Health (GEH).

Publication types

Substances