Surgical teaching of the retropubic midurethral sling: a virtual reality training system
- PMID: 36692526
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05448-x
Surgical teaching of the retropubic midurethral sling: a virtual reality training system
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: The objective is to develop a low-risk, cost-effective method to teach procedures that require learning by feel and high-volume pattern recognition, starting with the midurethral sling.
Methods: This video describes the creation of a virtual reality model utilizing de-identified patient data, artificial intelligence algorithms and haptics; and demonstrates the use of the training system for trocar passage of the retropubic midurethral sling procedure.
Results: This innovative system overcomes the lack of visualization and "blind" nature of sling surgery. Novel artificial intelligence provides high accuracy of anatomical landmarks and a realistic 3D environment. The trainee benefits from haptic and visual alerts for real-time feedback on the trocar insertion pathway and scoring to develop competency.
Conclusion: This is one of the first noncadaveric, nonstatic models available in the field. It allows for multiple low-risk exercises and provides more surgeons with training outside the operating room, at their own institution, and avoids the need for patient subjects. Training can be disseminated at a significantly lower cost and greater convenience than remote cadaver laboratories or intraoperative observation and has a higher fidelity than available static models, particularly after multiple passes. This has implications not only for retropubic midurethral slings but also for urogynecological and "blind" surgery as a whole.
Keywords: Haptics; Midurethral sling; Surgical education; Teaching; Virtual reality.
© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
References
-
- Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2066–76. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0912658 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, et al. Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(5):498.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.011 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Daneshgari F, Kong W, Swartz M. Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials. J Urol. 2008;180(5):1890–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.029 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Deng DY, Rutman M, Raz S, Rodriguez LV. Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: are complications under-reported? Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20357 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rangarajan K, Davis H, Pucher PH. Systematic review of virtual haptics in surgical simulation: a valid educational tool? J Surg Educ. 2020;77(2):337–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.09.006 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical