Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 24:25:e38535.
doi: 10.2196/38535.

Web-based Guidance for Assisted Reproductive Technology With an Online App (myFertiCare): Quantitative Evaluation With the HOT-fit Framework

Ellen Marie Sparidaens  1 , Jade G M Logger  2 , Willianne L D M Nelen  1 , Didi D M Braat  1 , Kathrin Fleischer  1 , Rosella P M Hermens  3
Affiliations

Web-based Guidance for Assisted Reproductive Technology With an Online App (myFertiCare): Quantitative Evaluation With the HOT-fit Framework

Ellen Marie Sparidaens et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are considered to be physically and mentally stressful. During their treatment trajectory, couples express high information and communication needs. They appreciate using the internet to obtain fertility-related information. In a previous study, we developed myFertiCare, an eHealth tool providing personalized information and interactive functionalities for infertile couples in order to improve patient-centered care. The app has already been successful in qualitative evaluations of usability.

Objective: The aim of the current study is to quantitatively evaluate the implementation of myFertiCare by using the human, organizational, and technology-fit (HOT-fit) framework and to study the effects of using myFertiCare on couples' knowledge about infertility, their experience of the burden of infertility, and their experience of patient-centered care. With these results, implementation can be further improved, and patient-centered care can be enhanced.

Methods: A quantitative study was performed based on the HOT-fit framework using validated questionnaires focusing on the human, organizational, and technology domains. Questions were added on the effect of using myFertiCare on couples' knowledge about infertility and treatment. Questions regarding the burden of infertility, the burden of infertility treatment, and the experience of patient-centeredness were based on the main items of the validated fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) and Patient-Centredness Questionnaire-Infertility questionnaires, respectively. Also, nonusers of the app were included to explore motivations for not using the app and identify opportunities for improvement. Finally, user data were analyzed to provide insight into multiple variables concerning app use.

Results: In the human and technology domains, myFertiCare showed good system usability, high user satisfaction, and high information and interface quality. In the organizational domain, implementation was considered to be sufficient by both patients and staff. Use of the app increased knowledge about the treatment, improved coping with the treatment, and enhanced the experience of patient-centeredness. User data showed that women were the main app users and that use of the app gradually declined during the treatment trajectory.

Conclusions: A multi-faceted online app, myFertiCare, has been successfully evaluated quantitatively for implementation by using the HOT-fit framework. Use of the app increased knowledge about the treatment, improved coping with the treatment, and enhanced the experience of patient-centeredness. App use could be improved by creating more publicity. By providing myFertiCare, professionals in fertility care are supported in guiding patients through their treatment trajectory and in delivering patient-centered care.

Keywords: HOT-fit framework; app; application; assisted reproductive technologies; care; eHealth; evaluation; infertility; interactive; internet; online; personalized; reproductive; stress; technology; tool; treatment; usability; variables; women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the participating couples.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of myFertiCare on the burden of infertility and treatment. The respondents were asked to complete the following sentence: “myFertiCare positively contributed to my...”.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of myFertiCare on the experience of patient-centeredness of care. The respondents were asked to complete the following sentence: “myFertiCare increased...”.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Van Asselt KM, Hinloopen RJ, Silvius AM, Van der Linden PJQ, Van Oppen CCAN, Van Balen JAM. NHG-standaard subfertiliteit. Huisarts Wet. 2010;53:203–14. https://www.henw.org/system/files/download/hw1004-203.pdf
    1. Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Friol K, Tigges J, Freundl G. Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1144–7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh870.deh870 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verhaak C, Smeenk J, Evers A, Kremer J, Kraaimaat F, Braat D. Women's emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(1):27–36. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml040.dml040 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dancet EA, Van Empel IWH, Rober P, Nelen WL, Kremer JA, D'Hooghe TM. Patient-centred infertility care: a qualitative study to listen to the patient's voice. Hum Reprod. 2011 Apr;26(4):827–33. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der022.der022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haagen EC, Tuil W, Hendriks J, de Bruijn RPJ, Braat DDM, Kremer JAM. Current Internet use and preferences of IVF and ICSI patients. Hum Reprod. 2003 Oct 01;18(10):2073–8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg423. - DOI - PubMed