Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 20;36(2):270-280.
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00337. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

Role of Human Aldo-Keto Reductases and Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 in the Metabolic Activation of 1-Nitropyrene via Nitroreduction in Human Lung Cells

Affiliations

Role of Human Aldo-Keto Reductases and Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 in the Metabolic Activation of 1-Nitropyrene via Nitroreduction in Human Lung Cells

Anthony L Su et al. Chem Res Toxicol. .

Abstract

1-Nitropyrene (1-NP) is a constituent of diesel exhaust and classified as a group 2A probable human carcinogen. The metabolic activation of 1-NP by nitroreduction generates electrophiles that can covalently bind DNA to form mutations to contribute to cancer causation. NADPH-dependent P450 oxidoreductase (POR), xanthine oxidase (XO), aldehyde oxidase (AOX), and NAD(P)H/quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) may catalyze 1-NP nitroreduction. We recently found that human recombinant aldo-keto reductases (AKRs) 1C1-1C3 catalyze 1-NP nitroreduction. NQO1 and AKR1C1-1C3 are genes induced by nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2). Despite this knowledge, the relative importance of these enzymes and NRF2 to 1-NP nitroreduction is unknown. We used a combination of pharmacological and genetic approaches to assess the relative importance of these enzymes and NRF2 in the aerobic nitroreduction of 1-NP in human bronchial epithelial cells, A549 and HBEC3-KT. 1-NP nitroreduction was assessed by the measurement of 1-aminopyrene (1-AP), the six-electron reduced metabolite of 1-NP, based on its intrinsic fluorescence properties (λex and λem). We found that co-treatment of 1-NP with salicylic acid, an AKR1C1 inhibitor, or ursodeoxycholate, an AKR1C2 inhibitor, for 48 h decreased 1-AP production relative to 1-NP treatment alone (control) in both cell lines. R-Sulforaphane or 1-(2-cyano-3,12,28-trioxooleana-1,9(11)-dien-28-yl)-1H-imidazole (CDDO-Im), two NRF2 activators, each increased 1-AP production relative to control only in HBEC3-KT cells, which have inducible NRF2. Inhibitors of POR, NQO1, and XO failed to modify 1-AP production relative to control in both cell lines. Importantly, A549 wild-type cells with constitutively active NRF2 produced more 1-AP than A549 cells with heterozygous expression of NFE2L2/NRF2, which were able to produce more 1-AP than A549 cells with homozygous knockout of NFE2L2/NRF2. Together, these data show dependence of 1-NP metabolic activation on AKR1Cs and NRF2 in human lung cells. This is the second example whereby NFE2L2/NRF2 is implicated in the carcinogenicity of diesel exhaust constituents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

TMP is a member of the Expert Panel for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, the founder of Penzymes, and is a consultant for Propella Therapeutics.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Time and concentration-dependence of 1-AP generation in (A) A549 cells and (B) HBEC3-KT cells. N = 6 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each for (A) and n = 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each for (B). All error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Effect of AKR1C inhibitors on the ability of (A) A549 cells and (B) HBEC3-KT cells to produce 1-AP following 1-NP exposure. N = 5 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each for (A) and n = 4 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each for (B). Each individual data point represents the average of technical replicates within one experiment. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison of means. Groups with non-shared superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); shared superscript letters show no statistical significance between compared groups. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. Treatment durations were 48 h for (A-B). Abbreviations: 1-NP, 1-nitropyrene; FA, flufenamic acid; SA, salicylic acid; UD, ursodeoxycholate.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Effect of AKR1C3-specific inhibitors on the ability of (A) A549 cells and (B) HBEC3-KT cells to produce 1-AP following 1-NP exposure. N = 4 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each for (A) and (B). Each individual data point represents the average of technical replicates within one experiment. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison of means. Groups with non-shared superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); shared superscript letters show no statistical significance between compared groups. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. Treatment durations were 48 h for (A-B). Abbreviations: 1-NP, 1-nitropyrene; ASP9521, (4-(2-hydroxy-2-methylpropyl)piperidin-1-yl)(5-methoxy-1H-indol-2-yl)methanone; BMT4-159, 3-4-trifluoromethyl-phenylamino-benzoic acid; INDO, indomethacin.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Effect of NRF2 modulators on the ability of (A) A549 cells and (B-C) HBEC3-KT cells to produce 1-AP following 1-NP exposure. N = 6 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each for (A) and n = 4 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each for (B) and (C). Each individual data point represents the average of technical replicates within one experiment. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison of means. Groups with non-shared superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); shared superscript letters show no statistical significance between compared groups. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. Treatment durations were 48 h for (A-C). Abbreviations: 1-NP, 1-nitropyrene; SFN, R-sulforaphane; CDDO-Im, 1-(2-cyano-3,12,28-trioxooleana-1,9(11)-dien-28-yl)-1H-imidazole; ML385, N-[4-[2,3-dihydro-1-(2-methylbenzoyl)-1H-indol-5-yl]-5-methyl-2-thiazolyl]-1,3-benzodioxole-5-acetamide; ATRA, all-trans retinoic acid.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Effect of inhibitors of additional nitroreductases on the ability of (A) A549 cells and (B-C) HBEC3-KT cells to produce 1-AP following 1-NP exposure. N = 6 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each for (A), n = 4 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each for (B), and n = 5 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each for (C). Each individual data point represents the average of technical replicates within one experiment. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison of means. Groups with non-shared superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); shared superscript letters show no statistical significance between compared groups. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. Treatment durations were 48 h for (A-C). MD was not included for HBEC3-KT cells because a false positive signal developed with MD in the HBEC3-KT medium. Abbreviations: 1-NP, 1-nitropyrene; CEES, 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide; MD, menadione; DIC, dicoumarol; ALP, allopurinol; ROT, rotenone; CDDO-Im, 1-(2-cyano-3,12,28-trioxooleana-1,9(11)-dien-28-yl)-1H-imidazole.
Figure 6:
Figure 6:
Effect of POR inhibitors on the ability of (A) A549 cells and (B) HBEC3-KT cells to produce 1-AP following 1-NP exposure. N = 4 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each for (A-B). Each individual data point represents the average of technical replicates within one experiment. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison of means. Groups with non-shared superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); shared superscript letters show no statistical significance between compared groups. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. Treatment durations were 48 h for (A-B). Abbreviations: 1-NP, 1-nitropyrene; DPI, diphenyleneiodonium sulfate; OCA, n-octylamine.
Figure 7:
Figure 7:
Effect of NFE2L2/NRF2 gene editing on the ability of A549 cells to produce 1-AP following 1-NP exposure. N = 6 independent experiments performed in triplicate for each. Each individual data point represents the average of technical replicates within one experiment. Statistical analysis was performed with two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison of means. Groups with non-shared superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); shared superscript letters show no statistical significance between compared groups. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. Treatment durations were 48 h. Abbreviations: 1-NP, 1-nitropyrene; MD, menadione; ROT, rotenone.
Figure 8:
Figure 8:
Scheme of the dependence of nitroreduction of 1-NP on NRF2 and AKR1C1-1C3 in a system of constitutive NRF2 versus inducible NRF2. We found that AKR1C1-1C3 inhibitors reduce 1-AP production in each cell type, and effects of flufenamic acid, salicylic acid, and ursodeoxycholate were particularly potent in HBEC3-KT cells, each causing over 70% inhibition to support that AKR1Cs are the major 1-NP nitroreductases in HBEC3-KT cells. Whereas NRF2 activators were effective at increasing 1-AP production in HBEC3-KT cells that have inducible NRF2, NRF2 inhibitors were effective at decreasing 1-AP production in A549 cells that have constitutively active NRF2. By contrast, we did not find POR inhibitors, a NQO1 inhibitor, or a XO inhibitor to reduce 1-AP production in either cell type. Our results with rotenone imply a role of ROS or mitochondrial nitroreductases in the nitroreduction of 1-NP, particularly for A549 cells where AKR1C inhibition could not explain all contribution to 1-NP nitroreduction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Incidence, Prevalence, and Years Lived with Disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 Countries and Territories, 1990-2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392 (10159), 1789–1858. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turner MC; Andersen ZJ; Baccarelli A; Diver WR; Gapstur SM; Pope CA; Prada D; Samet J; Thurston G; Cohen A Outdoor Air Pollution and Cancer: An Overview of the Current Evidence and Public Health Recommendations. CA Cancer J Clin 2020. 10.3322/caac.21632. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benbrahim-Tallaa L; Baan RA; Grosse Y; Lauby-Secretan B; el Ghissassi F; Bouvard V; Guha N; Loomis D; Straif K; International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. Carcinogenicity of Diesel-Engine and Gasoline-Engine Exhausts and Some Nitroarenes. Lancet Oncol 2012, 13 (7), 663–664. 10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70280-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. DIESEL AND GASOLINE ENGINE EXHAUSTS AND SOME NITROARENES. IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC RISKS TO HUMANS. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 2014, 105, 9–699. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olsson AC; Gustavsson P; Kromhout H; Peters S; Vermeulen R; Brüske I; Pesch B; Siemiatycki J; Pintos J; Brüning T; Cassidy A; Wichmann H-E; Consonni D; Landi MT; Caporaso N; Plato N; Merletti F; Mirabelli D; Richiardi L; Jöckel K-H; Ahrens W; Pohlabeln H; Lissowska J; Szeszenia-Dabrowska N; Zaridze D; Stücker I; Benhamou S; Bencko V; Foretova L; Janout V; Rudnai P; Fabianova E; Dumitru RS; Gross IM; Kendzia B; Forastiere F; Bueno-de-Mesquita B; Brennan P; Boffetta P; Straif K Exposure to Diesel Motor Exhaust and Lung Cancer Risk in a Pooled Analysis from Case-Control Studies in Europe and Canada. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011, 183 (7), 941–948. 10.1164/rccm.201006-0940OC. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types