Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 24;18(1):e0280956.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280956. eCollection 2023.

Digital transition in rural emergency medicine: Impact of job satisfaction and workload on communication and technology acceptance

Affiliations

Digital transition in rural emergency medicine: Impact of job satisfaction and workload on communication and technology acceptance

Joachim P Hasebrook et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Tele-emergency physicians (TEPs) take an increasingly important role in the need-oriented provision of emergency patient care. To improve emergency medicine in rural areas, we set up the project 'Rural|Rescue', which uses TEPs to restructure professional rescue services using information and communication technologies (ICTs) in order to reduce the therapy-free interval. Successful implementation of ICTs relies on user acceptance and knowledge sharing behavior.

Method: We conducted a factorial design with active knowledge transfer and technology acceptance as a function of work satisfaction (high vs. low), workload (high vs. low) and point in time (prior to vs. after digitalization). Data were collected via machine readable questionnaires issued to 755 persons (411 pre, 344 post), of which 304 or 40.3% of these persons responded (194 pre, 115 post).

Results: Technology acceptance was higher after the implementation of TEP for nurses but not for other professions, and it was higher when the workload was high. Regarding active communication and knowledge sharing, employees with low work satisfaction are more likely to share their digital knowledge as compared to employees with high work satisfaction. This is an effect of previous knowledge concerning digitalization: After implementing the new technology, work satisfaction increased for the more experienced employees, but not for the less experienced ones.

Conclusion: Our research illustrates that employees' workload has an impact on the intention of using digital applications. The higher the workload, the more people are willing to use TEPs. Regarding active knowledge sharing, we see that employees with low work satisfaction are more likely to share their digital knowledge compared to employees with high work satisfaction. This might be attributed to the Dunning-Kruger effect. Highly knowledgeable employees initially feel uncertain about the change, which translates into temporarily lower work satisfaction. They feel the urge to fill even small knowledge gaps, which in return leads to higher work satisfaction. Those responsible need to acknowledge that digital change affects their employees' workflow and work satisfaction. During such times, employees need time and support to gather information and knowledge in order to cope with digitally changed tasks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Factor analyses to identify the items of the scale on active individual knowledge transfer.
left: preliminary solution, right: final solution; numbers refer to item numbers in Table 3.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Effect of satisfaction level (quartile groups from highest to lowest) on active knowledge transfer.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Active knowledge transfer as a function of point in time (pre vs. post) and management position (leading vs. non leading).
Fig 4
Fig 4
Impact of point in time (left) and interaction of time and experience (right) on satisfaction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akenroye TO. Factors influencing innovation in healthcare: a conceptual synthesis. The Innovation Journal. 2012;17(2):1.
    1. Hernandez SE, Conrad DA, Marcus-Smith MS, Reed P, Watts C. Patient-centered innovation in health care organizations: a conceptual framework and case study application. Health Care Management Review. 2013;38(2):166–75. - PubMed
    1. Omachonu VK, Einspruch NG. Innovation in healthcare delivery systems: a conceptual framework. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal. 2010;15(1):1–20.
    1. Fair C, Cuttance J, Sharma N, Maslow G, Wiener L, Betz C, et al.. International and interdisciplinary identification of health care transition outcomes. JAMA pediatrics. 2016;170(3):205–11. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3168 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berwick DM. Disseminating innovations in health care. Jama. 2003;289(15):1969–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.15.1969 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types