Undue Burdens: State Abortion Laws in the United States, 1994-2022
- PMID: 36693181
- DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10449905
Undue Burdens: State Abortion Laws in the United States, 1994-2022
Abstract
State laws have influenced access to abortion in the 50 years since Roe v. Wade. The 2022 Dobbs decision returned questions about the legality of abortion to the states, which increased the importance of state laws for abortion access. The objective of this study is to illustrate trends in abortion-restrictive and abortion-supportive state laws using a unique longitudinal database of reproductive health laws across the United States from 1994 to 2022. This study offers a descriptive analysis of historical trends in state-level pre-viability abortion bans, abortion method bans, efforts to dissuade abortion, TRAP (targeted regulation of abortion providers) laws, other laws that restrict reproductive choice, and laws that expand abortion access and support reproductive health. Data sources include state statutes (from Nexis Uni) and secondary sources. The data reveal that pre-viability bans, including gestation-based bans and total bans, became significantly more prevalent over time. Other abortion-restrictive laws increased from 1994 to 2022, but states also passed a growing number of laws that support reproductive health. Increasing polarization into abortion-restrictive and abortion-supportive states characterized the 1994-2022 period. These trends have implications for maternal and infant health and for racial/ethnic and income disparities.
Keywords: abortion; personhood; reproductive health law; reproductive justice.
Copyright © 2023 by Duke University Press.
Similar articles
-
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518. JAMA Health Forum. 2023. PMID: 37115538 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Restricted Abortion Access and Child Entries Into the Foster Care System.JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Jan 1;178(1):37-44. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.4738. JAMA Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 37930718 Free PMC article.
-
Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995. J Leg Med. 1995. PMID: 8568420 Review.
-
Assessing the Impact of Dobbs on Abortion Perceptions and Attitudes in More Restrictive Versus Less Restrictive State Policy Environments: Evidence from Arizona, Wisconsin, and New Jersey.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2025 Jun;34(6):855-867. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0565. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2025. PMID: 40499060
-
Abortion Shield Laws.NEJM Evid. 2023 Apr;2(4):EVIDra2200280. doi: 10.1056/EVIDra2200280. Epub 2023 Mar 28. NEJM Evid. 2023. PMID: 38320012 Review.
Cited by
-
Abortion access in the Americas: a hemispheric and historical approach.Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 6;11:1284737. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1284737. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 38125840 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical