Measuring Violence Against Children: A COSMIN Systematic Review of the Psychometric and Administrative Properties of Adult Retrospective Self-report Instruments on Child Abuse and Neglect
- PMID: 36695372
- PMCID: PMC10666516
- DOI: 10.1177/15248380221145912
Measuring Violence Against Children: A COSMIN Systematic Review of the Psychometric and Administrative Properties of Adult Retrospective Self-report Instruments on Child Abuse and Neglect
Abstract
Valid, meaningful, and reliable adult retrospective measures of violence against children (VAC) are essential for establishing the prevalence, risk factors, and long-term effects of VAC. We aim to summarize the available evidence on the psychometric properties of adult retrospective VAC measures and to provide evidence-based recommendations for appropriate measure selection. We searched six electronic databases and gray literature for studies that report on the development, content validity, or psychometric properties of adult retrospective child abuse and neglect measures for this review (PROSPERO: CRD4201706). We used the 2018 Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria to evaluate each included study and measure. We assessed if measures included questions on frequency or severity, the perpetrator, or the location of the violence, and noted the administrative practicalities for each instrument such as length, readability, available translations, and cost to access. We identified 288 studies and 77 measures. The quality of evidence ranged from "low" to "high," depending on the measure and the psychometric properties assessed. The measures with the most robust evidence available across multiple contexts are the: ACE and ACE-IQ; FBQ and FBQ-U; CTQ and CTQ-SF; and ICAST-R. This review shows the strengths and weaknesses of retrospective VAC measures. The substantial evidence presented in this review can be used by researchers to make psychometrically sound decisions for measurement selection which should be supported by extensive piloting and adaptation to the respective local context.
Keywords: child abuse; measurement; psychometric properties; systematic review; violence against children.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: FM is an elected Board Member of the International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect which retains the rights to the ICAST child abuse measure. Michael Dunne is one of the original developers of the ICAST-R.
Figures
References
-
- Asmundson G. G., Afifi T. O. (2019). Adverse childhood experiences: Using evidence to advance research, practice, policy, and prevention. Academic Press.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020, April 3). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system ACE data |violence prevention|injury Center|CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved March 9, 2022, from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/ace-brfss.html
-
- Easton S. D. (2012). Disclosure of child sexual abuse among adult male survivors. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41(4), 344–355. 10.1007/s10615-012-0420-3 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous