Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Feb 28;18(1):nsad003.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad003.

Relational vs representational social cognitive processing: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data

Maria Arioli  1 , Zaira Cattaneo  1   2 , Simone Parimbelli  3 , Nicola Canessa  3   4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Relational vs representational social cognitive processing: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data

Maria Arioli et al. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. .

Abstract

The neurocognitive bases of social cognition have been framed in terms of representing others' actions through the mirror system and their mental states via the mentalizing network. Alongside representing another person's actions or mental states, however, social cognitive processing is also shaped by their (mis)match with one's own corresponding states. Here, we addressed the distinction between representing others' states through the action observation or mentalizing networks (i.e. representational processing) and detecting the extent to which such states align with one's own ones (i.e. relational processing, mediated by social conflict). We took a meta-analytic approach to unveil the neural bases of both relational and representational processing by focusing on previously reported brain activations from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies using false-belief and action observation tasks. Our findings suggest that relational processing for belief and action states involves, respectively, the left and right temporo-parietal junction, likely contributing to self-other differentiation. Moreover, distinct sectors of the posterior fronto-medial cortex support social conflict processing for belief and action, possibly through the inhibition of conflictual representations. These data might pave the way for further studies addressing social conflict as an important component of normal and pathological processing, and inform the design of rehabilitative treatments for social deficits.

Keywords: action observation; mentalizing; relational; representational; temporo-parietal junction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
PRISMA flowchart of literature search and selection process for false-belief task
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
PRISMA flowchart of literature search and selection process for action observation tasks.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Brain activations associated with (A) action representation (red), (B) action relational (blue), (C) belief representation (green), and (D) belief relational (light blue) processes. L: left; R: right.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
The figure depicts, with different colours, the common and specific brain structures across action representation and action relational processes (A), belief representation and belief relational processes (B) and action relational and belief relational processes (C). L: left; R: right.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abraham A., Rakoczy H., Werning M., von Cramon D.Y., Schubotz R.I. (2010). Matching mind to world and vice versa: functional dissociations between belief and desire mental state processing. Social Neuroscience, 5(1), 1–18. - PubMed
    1. Acar F., Seurinck R., Eickhoff S.B., Moerkerke B. (2018). Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI. PLoS One, 13(11), e0208177. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aichhorn M., Perner J., Weiss B., Kronbichler M., Staffen W., Ladurner G. (2009). Temporo-parietal junction activity in theory-of-mind tasks: falseness, beliefs, or attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(6), 1179–92. - PubMed
    1. Akitsuki Y., Decety J. (2009). Social context and perceived agency affects empathy for pain: an event-related fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 47(2), 722–34. - PubMed
    1. Alderson-Day B., Weis S., McCarthy-Jones S., Moseley P., Smailes D., Fernyhough C. (2016). The brain’s conversation with itself: neural substrates of dialogic inner speech. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(1), 110–20. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types