Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 27;51(1):1-12.
doi: 10.1042/BST20210145.

Computational approaches to understand transcription regulation in development

Affiliations
Review

Computational approaches to understand transcription regulation in development

Maarten van der Sande et al. Biochem Soc Trans. .

Abstract

Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) serve as useful abstractions to understand transcriptional dynamics in developmental systems. Computational prediction of GRNs has been successfully applied to genome-wide gene expression measurements with the advent of microarrays and RNA-sequencing. However, these inferred networks are inaccurate and mostly based on correlative rather than causative interactions. In this review, we highlight three approaches that significantly impact GRN inference: (1) moving from one genome-wide functional modality, gene expression, to multi-omics, (2) single cell sequencing, to measure cell type-specific signals and predict context-specific GRNs, and (3) neural networks as flexible models. Together, these experimental and computational developments have the potential to significantly impact the quality of inferred GRNs. Ultimately, accurately modeling the regulatory interactions between transcription factors and their target genes will be essential to understand the role of transcription factors in driving developmental gene expression programs and to derive testable hypotheses for validation.

Keywords: developmental biology; functional genomics; gene expression and regulation; gene regulatory networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Schematic overview of different gene regulatory network inference approaches.
(A) Classical approaches, e.g. correlation, regression or mutual information, can be applied on gene expression data to generate undirected co-expression networks. With prior knowledge about TFs the directionality between TF and target gene can be inferred, however, the directionality between two TFs cannot be established. (B) More recent approaches combine multiple types of genome-wide functional data (multi-omics), with either a classical approach or neural networks to identify directed gene regulatory networks. Single cell sequencing allows for the identification of cell type specific regulatory networks.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mammoto, A., Mammoto, T. and Ingber, D.E. (2012) Mechanosensitive mechanisms in transcriptional regulation. J. Cell Sci. 125, 3061–3073 10.1242/jcs.093005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameron, R.A., Hough-Evans, B.R., Britten, R.J. and Davidson, E.H. (1987) Lineage and fate of each blastomere of the eight-cell sea urchin embryo. Genes Dev. 1, 75–85 10.1101/gad.1.1.75 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper, G.M. (2000) Regulation of Transcription in Eukaryotes. In The Cell: A Molecular Approach, 2nd edn, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9904/
    1. Li, Y.J., Fu, X.H., Liu, D.P. and Liang, C.C. (2004) Opening the chromatin for transcription. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 36, 1411–1423 10.1016/j.biocel.2003.11.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McMahon, A.P., Novak, T.J., Britten, R.J. and Davidson, E.H. (1984) Inducible expression of a cloned heat shock fusion gene in sea urchin embryos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 7490–7494 10.1073/pnas.81.23.7490 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances