A systematic review of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques
- PMID: 36695820
- PMCID: PMC9877258
- DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00577-0
A systematic review of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques
Abstract
Purpose: Aim of this systematic review was to analyze the outcome after transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents regarding the femoral drilling technique.
Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on studies on transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents. The literature search was limited to the last 20 years. Primary outcome criterion was the failure rate. Secondary outcome criteria were growth disturbances such as leg length discrepancies or deformities and clinical scores. The present study was registered prospectively ( www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ; CRD42022345964).
Results: A total of 22 retrospective or prospective case series (level 4 evidence) were identified that reported on transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents. The overall failure/rupture rate after transphyseal ACL reconstruction was 11.0%. The overall ACL rupture rate of the contralateral side was 9.7%. No statistical significant difference in the failure rates between independent and transtibial drilling techniques could be detected ((p = 0.76/p = 0.28)). Furthermore no statistical significant differences in the rate of reported growth disturbances between independent and transtibial drilling techniques were shown (p = 0.15). The reported clinical scores at follow-up (mean follow-up 5.05 years) revealed good to very good results.
Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrates that children and adolescents have a relatively high failure rate after transpyseal ACL reconstruction without any statistically significant differences between independent or transtibial drilling techniques regarding reruptur rates or the rate of growth disturbances. The results of this systematic review warrant a comparison of both techniques for femoral tunnel drilling in a controlled randomized trial.
Keywords: ACL injury; ACL repair; Anatomical ACL reconstruction; Knee; Medial portal drilling.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Transphyseal ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Does Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling Place the Physis at Greater Risk Compared With Transtibial Drilling?Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Jun 7;4(6):2325967116650432. doi: 10.1177/2325967116650432. eCollection 2016 Jun. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 27331075 Free PMC article.
-
No difference in revision rates between anteromedial portal and transtibial drilling of the femoral graft tunnel in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: early results from the New Zealand ACL Registry.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Nov;28(11):3631-3638. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05959-w. Epub 2020 Apr 1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020. PMID: 32239269
-
Hybrid Transtibial Femoral Preparation for Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Radiographic Comparison With the Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Techniques.Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov 18;9(11):23259671211054509. doi: 10.1177/23259671211054509. eCollection 2021 Nov. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34820462 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Anteromedial Portal Versus Transtibial Technique in ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 2;9(7):23259671211024591. doi: 10.1177/23259671211024591. eCollection 2021 Jul. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34277881 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Independent Versus Transtibial Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis With Meta-regression.Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 12;9(7):23259671211015616. doi: 10.1177/23259671211015616. eCollection 2021 Jul. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34291116 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A randomized trial on transphyseal vs. physeal-sparing reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: functional outcomes and safety considerations.Eur J Transl Myol. 2024 Dec 6;34(4):13221. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.13221. Eur J Transl Myol. 2024. PMID: 39655666 Free PMC article.
-
All-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yields superior sports performances than the trans-epiphyseal technique in skeletally immature patients: a systematic review.J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Feb 20;25(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00751-9. J Orthop Traumatol. 2024. PMID: 38376718 Free PMC article.
-
Transphyseal arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children under 12 years.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3553-3564. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05497-x. Epub 2024 Aug 23. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 39174765
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources