Operative room time comparison between general and spinal anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty: an institutional study
- PMID: 36695906
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04775-4
Operative room time comparison between general and spinal anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty: an institutional study
Abstract
Purpose: A relatively high expense with any procedure is total operative time; two components being the time spent anesthetizing the patient and time spent transferring the patient out of the operating room (OR). Both times can be affected by the anesthetic method used. This study compares different operative time intervals for both spinal anesthesia (SA) and general anesthesia (GA), in patients undergoing a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), to identify the most appropriate and cost-effective anesthetic method.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed at a single institution for primary total hip arthroplasty procedures performed in the year 2019. Primary THAs without complications performed by three orthopedic surgeons were selected. Anesthesia records for 200 patients were used to compare perioperative time intervals; 100 consecutive patients that received SA and 100 consecutive patients that received GA.
Results: The time spent transferring the patient out of the operating room was 8 min for GA and 5 min for SA (p < 0.001). Total operative time for GA was 90 min and 87 min for SA (p = 0.3330). Total pre-operative time averaged 26 min in SA compared to 25 min in GA (p = 0.5874). Non-operative total time (all time components of patient interaction excluding surgery start to surgery finish) was significantly shorter in SA with an average of 52 compared to 56 in GA (p = 0.0151).
Conclusion: Time to transfer patient out of the OR and total non-operative time was significantly shorter in patients who received spinal anesthesia. These results and the complications of both general and spinal anesthesia should be taken into consideration when anesthetizing patients undergoing primary THA.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: Cost–benefit analysis; General anesthesia; Operative time; Spinal anesthesia; Total hip arthroplasty.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Does spinal anesthesia for total hip or knee arthroplasty entail longer operating room occupancy compared to general anesthesia? Case-control study of 337 spinal versus 243 general anesthesias.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Apr;110(2):103794. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103794. Epub 2023 Dec 9. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 38081357
-
Is a Failed Spinal Attempt Associated With a Worse Clinical Course Following Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?J Arthroplasty. 2024 Nov;39(11):2669-2674.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.049. Epub 2024 May 29. J Arthroplasty. 2024. PMID: 38821430
-
Comparative outcome analysis of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in lumbar fusion surgery.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Nov 27;13:122-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.11.017. eCollection 2021 Feb. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020. PMID: 33680810 Free PMC article.
-
Changing a clinical pathway to increase spinal anesthesia use for elective hip arthroplasty: a single-centre historical cohort study.Can J Anaesth. 2023 Feb;70(2):211-218. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02371-5. Epub 2022 Dec 8. Can J Anaesth. 2023. PMID: 36482246 Review. English.
-
General anesthesia vs spinal anesthesia for patients undergoing total-hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(16):e14925. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014925. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31008923 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Spinal Anesthesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty is Associated With Improved Outcomes in the American Joint Replacement Registry Population.Arthroplast Today. 2024 Oct 30;30:101566. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101566. eCollection 2024 Dec. Arthroplast Today. 2024. PMID: 39539684 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kremers HM, Larson DR, Crowson CS et al (2014) Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01141 - DOI
-
- White SM, Moppett IK, Griffiths R et al (2016) Secondary analysis of outcomes after 11,085 hip fracture operations from the prospective UK Anaesthesia Sprint Audit of Practice (ASAP-2). Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13415 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kowark A (2020) Improve Hip Fracture Outcome In The Elderly Patient (iHOPE): a multicentre randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of spinal versus general anaesthesia. Anaesthesist. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-020-00785-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Zheng X, Tan Y, Gao Y, Liu Z (2020) Comparative efficacy of Neuraxial and general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BMC Anesthesiol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01074-y - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Biboulet P, Jourdan A, Van Haevre V et al (2012) Hemodynamic profile of target-controlled spinal anesthesia compared with 2 target-controlled general anesthesia techniques in elderly patients with cardiac comorbidities. Reg Anesth Pain Med. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e318252e901 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials