Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 25;22(1):13.
doi: 10.1186/s12944-022-01762-3.

Determination of endogenous sphingolipid content in stroke rats and HT22 cells subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation by LC‒MS/MS

Affiliations

Determination of endogenous sphingolipid content in stroke rats and HT22 cells subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation by LC‒MS/MS

Keqi Zeng et al. Lipids Health Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Stroke is the leading cause of death in humans worldwide, and its incidence increases every year. It is well documented that lipids are closely related to stroke. Analyzing the changes in lipid content in the stroke model after absolute quantification and investigating whether changes in lipid content can predict stroke severity provides a basis for the combination of clinical stroke and quantitative lipid indicators.

Methods: This paper establishes a rapid, sensitive, and reliable LC‒MS/MS analytical method for the detection of endogenous sphingolipids in rat serum and brain tissue and HT22 cells and quantifies the changes in sphingolipid content in the serum and brain tissue of rats from the normal and pMCAO groups and in cells from the normal and OGD/R groups. Using sphingosine (d17:1) as the internal standard, a chloroform: methanol (9:1) mixed system was used for protein precipitation and lipid extraction, followed by analysis by reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Results: Based on absolute quantitative analysis of lipids in multiple biological samples, our results show that compared with those in the normal group, the contents of sphinganine (d16:0), sphinganine (d18:0), and phytosphingosine were significantly increased in the model group, except sphingosine-1-phosphate, which was decreased in various biological samples. The levels of each sphingolipid component in serum fluctuate with time.

Conclusion: This isotope-free and derivatization-free LC‒MS/MS method can achieve absolute quantification of sphingolipids in biological samples, which may also help identify lipid biomarkers of cerebral ischemia.

Keywords: Content determination; Endogenous; Ischemic stroke; Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; OGD/R-Induced; Sphingolipids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Verification of the pMCAO rat model and OGD/R HT22 model. a Determination of brain injury by TTC staining, b changes in weights of rats in normal and model groups, c cell viability detected by CCK-8, d inverted microscope to observe the morphological changes of HT22 cells after OGD/R injury
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Product ion mass spectra of sphingosine (d16:0) (A), sphinganine (d18:0) (B), phytosphingosine (C), sphingosine-1-phosphate (D) and sphingosine (d17:1) (IS, E)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Chromatograms of sphingolipids and internal standard. A Methanol B 4% BSA C Standard solution (dissolved in methanol) D Brain tissue sample (without internal standard) E Serum tissue sample (without internal standard) F Cell sample (without internal standard) G Brain tissue sample (with internal standard) H. Serum sample (with internal standard) L. Cell sample (with internal standard). 1. Sphingosine-1-phosphate; 2. Phytosphingosine; 3. Sphinganine (d18:0); 4. Sphingosine (d17:1); 5. Sphinganine (d16:0)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Changes in the contents of sphingosine-1-phosphate, phytosphingosine, sphinganine (d18:0), and sphinganine (d16:0) in the serum (A) and brain tissue (B) of SD rats in the normal and pMCAO groups and HT22 cells (C) in the normal and OGD/R groups (control, n = 6; model, n = 6). The data of each experiment are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Note. Compared with the normal or model group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Cheng S, Delling FN, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(8):e254–e743. doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000950. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(4):355–369. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70025-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cui Q, Naikoo NA. Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors in ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. Afr Health Sci. 2019;19(2):2121–2129. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i2.36. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kandregula S, Savardekar AR, Sharma P, McLarty J, Kosty J, Trosclair K, Cuellar H, Guthikonda B. Direct thrombectomy versus bridging thrombolysis with mechanical thrombectomy in middle cerebral artery stroke: a real-world analysis through National Inpatient Sample data. Neurosurg Focus. 2021;51(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2021.4.FOCUS21132. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huu An N, Dang Luu V, Duy Ton M, Anh Tuan T, Quang Anh N, Hoang Kien L, Tat Thien N, Viet Phuong D, Minh DN. Thrombectomy Alone versus Bridging Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Preliminary Results of an Experimental Trial. Clin Ter. 2022;173(2):107–114. doi: 10.7417/CT.2022.2403. - DOI - PubMed