Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):81.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09073-8.

Comparison of experiences of nursing staff and patients before and after move to 100% single-bed room hospital in Australia: mixed methods

Affiliations

Comparison of experiences of nursing staff and patients before and after move to 100% single-bed room hospital in Australia: mixed methods

Lynette Cusack et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: There is sufficient and consistent international evidence of issues reported by nurses working in single-bed room environments, requiring a design that is not only comfortable for patients but meets nurses working needs. This paper presents a comparison of nursing staff and patients experience prior to a move to 100% single-bed room hospital in 2016 (Stage 1) and actual experiences after the move in 2021 (Stage 2) in South Australia.

Method: Mixed method case study design. Survey sample of forty-two nursing staff; twelve patient interviews of their experiences of current environment and; thirteen nursing staff interviews of their experiences delivering nursing care in 100% single bed-room environment.

Results: Nurses and patients highlighted single-bed rooms contributed to patients' privacy, confidentiality, dignity and comfort. As anticipated in Stage 1, nurses in Stage 2 reported lack of patient and staff visibility. This impacted workload, workflow and concern for patient safety.

Conclusion: Patient and nursing staff experiences are interdependent, and implications of single-bed room accommodation are complicated. Future impacts on the health system will continue to affect hospital design, which must consider nurses working needs and patient safety and comfort.

Keywords: Case study; Mixed methods, Patient experiences; Nurses experiences; Single-bed room hospitals; Staff expectations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Means scores + 1 SD for ten sub-scales of the current ward layout, environment and facilities measured in four wards of the hospital during Stage 1 (darker) and Stage 2 (lighter). The sample size for each measure is included in the bars. ** P ≤ 0.001, * P ≤ 0.01)

References

    1. Cusack L, Wiechula R, Schultz T, Dollard J, Maben J. Anticipated advantages and disadvantages of a move to 100% single-room hospital in Australia: a case study. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(5):963–970. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12753. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maben J, Griffiths P, Penfold C, Simon M, Pizzo E, Anderson J, Robert G, Hughes J, Murrells T, Brearley S, Barlow J. Evaluating a major innovation in hospital design: workforce implications and impact on patient and staff experiences of all single room hospital accommodation. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2015. - PubMed
    1. Wiechula R, Conroy T, Cheney C, Or XH. Centre for Evidence-based Practice South Australia. Adelaide: University of Adelaide; 2015. Single room inpatient accommodation in acute care facilities: an integrative review.
    1. Søndergaard SF, Beedholm K, Kolbæk R, Frederiksen K. Patients’ and nurses’ experiences of all single-room hospital accommodation: a scoping review. HERD. 2022;15(1):292–314. doi: 10.1177/19375867211047548. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ulrich RS, Zimring C, Zhu X, DuBoseJ SHB, Choi YS, Joseph A. A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD. 2008;1(3):61–125. doi: 10.1177/193758670800100306. - DOI - PubMed