How perceptual differences between leaders and followers affect the resilience-workability relationship
- PMID: 36698602
- PMCID: PMC9869059
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1066909
How perceptual differences between leaders and followers affect the resilience-workability relationship
Abstract
Drawing on Conservation of Resources theory and its notion of resource passageways, the aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between resilience and workability, and particularly the extent in which this relationship is buffered or strengthened by differences in perception between leaders and employees about the degree in which a certain influence tactic (pressure or rational persuasion) is used. To this end, this study uses a two-wave time-lagged survey design with a multi-sourced sample of 146 leader-follower dyads. Findings indicate that leader-follower perceptual differences about the use of pressure as an influence tactic buffers the positive resilience-workability relationship of followers. No evidence was found of a similar effect with respect to rational persuasion as an influence tactic.
Keywords: dyads; influence tactics; pressure; rational persuasion; resilience; two-waved; workability.
Copyright © 2023 Caniëls.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Why Do Leaders Express Humility and How Does This Matter: A Rational Choice Perspective.Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 21;10:1925. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01925. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31496980 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of sex differences in leaders' behavior.Psychol Rep. 2005 Apr;96(2):499-510. doi: 10.2466/pr0.96.2.499-510. Psychol Rep. 2005. PMID: 15941127
-
How remote working increases the importance of positive leadership for employee vigor.Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 20;14:1089557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1089557. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36743246 Free PMC article.
-
The commerce and crossover of resources: resource conservation in the service of resilience.Stress Health. 2015 Apr;31(2):95-105. doi: 10.1002/smi.2574. Stress Health. 2015. PMID: 25873421 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Brain-Adjusted Relational Leadership: A Social-Constructed Consciousness Approach to Leader-Follower Interaction.Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 13;12:672217. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672217. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34326795 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Factorial validity and measurement invariance of a self-reported scale of paradoxical leadership behaviours: evidence from sport industry leaders.Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 21;16:1541891. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1541891. eCollection 2025. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40062195 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aiken L. S., West S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, London: Sage.
-
- Allen M. S., Iliescu D., Greiff S. (2022). Single item measures in psychological science. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 38, 1–5. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000699 - DOI
-
- Aslam M. Z., Fateh A., Omar S., Nazri M. (2021). The role of initiative climate as a resource caravan passageway in developing proactive service performance. Asia Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 14, 691–705. doi: 10.1108/APJBA-09-2021-0454 - DOI
-
- Avey J. B., Luthans F., Jensen S. M. (2009). Psychological capital: a positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Hum. Resour. Manag. 48, 677–693. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20294 - DOI
-
- Avey J. B., Reichard R. J., Luthans F., Mhatre K. M. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employees’ attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 22, 127–152. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.20070 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources