Development of a Chinese werewolf deception database
- PMID: 36698609
- PMCID: PMC9869050
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1047427
Development of a Chinese werewolf deception database
Abstract
Although it is important to accurately detect deception, limited research in this area has been undertaken involving Asian people. We aim to address this gap by undertaking research regarding the identification of deception in Asians in realistic environments. In this study, we develop a Chinese Werewolf Deception Database (C2W2D), which consists of 168 video clips (84 deception videos and 84 honest videos). A total of 1,738,760 frames of facial data are recorded. Fifty-eight healthy undergraduates (24 men and 34 women) and 26 drug addicts (26 men) participated in a werewolf game. The development of C2W2D is accomplished based on a "werewolf" deception game paradigm in which the participants spontaneously tell the truth or a lie. Two synced high-speed cameras are used to capture the game process. To explore the differences between lying and truth-telling in the database, descriptive statistics (e.g., duration and quantity) and hypothesis tests are conducted using action units (AUs) of facial expressions (e.g., t-test). The C2W2D contributes to a relatively sizable number of deceptive and honest samples with high ecological validity. These samples can be used to study the individual differences and the underlying mechanisms of lies and truth-telling between drug addicts and healthy people.
Keywords: cross-culture; deception database; ecological validity; emotion; facial expression; individual difference; video.
Copyright © 2023 Yang, You, Xie, Duan, Wang, Zhou, Feng, Wang, Fan, Huang and Shen.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Catching a Liar Through Facial Expression of Fear.Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 8;12:675097. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675097. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34168597 Free PMC article.
-
Let the man choose what to do: Neural correlates of spontaneous lying and truth-telling.Brain Cogn. 2016 Feb;102:13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 10. Brain Cogn. 2016. PMID: 26685089
-
To lie or to tell the truth? The influence of processing the opponent's feedback on the forthcoming choice.Front Psychol. 2024 May 9;15:1275884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1275884. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38784609 Free PMC article.
-
Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception.Psychol Bull. 2017 Apr;143(4):428-453. doi: 10.1037/bul0000087. Epub 2017 Feb 9. Psychol Bull. 2017. PMID: 28182460 Review.
-
The guilty brain: the utility of neuroimaging and neurostimulation studies in forensic field.Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):161-172. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2016-0048. Rev Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28030362 Review.
References
-
- Al-Simadi F. A. (2000). Detection of deceptive behavior: A cross-cultural test. Soc. Behav. Pers. 28 455–461. 10.2224/sbp.2000.28.5.455 - DOI
-
- Belot M., Bhaskar V., van de Ven J. (2010). Promises and cooperation: Evidence from a TV game show. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 73 396–405.
-
- Borza D., Itu R., Danescu R. (2018). In the eye of the deceiver: analyzing eye movements as a cue to deception. J. Imaging 4:120. 10.3390/jimaging4100120 - DOI
-
- Burgoon J. K., Metaxas D., Nunamaker J. F., Ge S. (2021). “Cultural influence on deceptive communication,” in Detecting Trust and Deception in Group Interaction, eds Subrahmanian V. S., Burgoon J. K., Dunbar N. E. (Cham: Springer International Publishing; ), 197–222. 10.1007/978-3-030-54383-9_11 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous