Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 9;16(1):3-21.
doi: 10.1111/eva.13513. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Towards evolutionary predictions: Current promises and challenges

Affiliations
Review

Towards evolutionary predictions: Current promises and challenges

Meike T Wortel et al. Evol Appl. .

Abstract

Evolution has traditionally been a historical and descriptive science, and predicting future evolutionary processes has long been considered impossible. However, evolutionary predictions are increasingly being developed and used in medicine, agriculture, biotechnology and conservation biology. Evolutionary predictions may be used for different purposes, such as to prepare for the future, to try and change the course of evolution or to determine how well we understand evolutionary processes. Similarly, the exact aspect of the evolved population that we want to predict may also differ. For example, we could try to predict which genotype will dominate, the fitness of the population or the extinction probability of a population. In addition, there are many uses of evolutionary predictions that may not always be recognized as such. The main goal of this review is to increase awareness of methods and data in different research fields by showing the breadth of situations in which evolutionary predictions are made. We describe how diverse evolutionary predictions share a common structure described by the predictive scope, time scale and precision. Then, by using examples ranging from SARS-CoV2 and influenza to CRISPR-based gene drives and sustainable product formation in biotechnology, we discuss the methods for predicting evolution, the factors that affect predictability and how predictions can be used to prevent evolution in undesirable directions or to promote beneficial evolution (i.e. evolutionary control). We hope that this review will stimulate collaboration between fields by establishing a common language for evolutionary predictions.

Keywords: disease modelling; evolution; evolutionary control; models; population genetics; predictability; prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Why do we need predictions? (1) To test hypotheses of evolution for a better fundamental understanding of evolving systems. Based on their phylogenetic history we can predict how species evolve when exposed to a given treatment. These predictions can be tested with experimental evolution approaches. (2) To be prepared for future outbreaks, we aim to match vaccines with the most common influenza strains each year. (3) To have control over evolutionary outcomes and design treatment strategies that prevent the evolution of resistance from happening in pathogens. In this review, we focus on predicting evolution for goals (2) and (3), while (1) plays a role in obtaining the information on the basis of these predictions.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Selection of methods that are used to predict evolution

References

    1. Abel Zur Wiesch, P. , Kouyos, R. , Abel, S. , Viechtbauer, W. , & Bonhoeffer, S. (2014). Cycling empirical antibiotic therapy in hospitals: Meta‐analysis and models. PLoS Pathogens, 10, e1004225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agashe, D. (2009). The stabilizing effect of intraspecific genetic variation on population dynamics in novel and ancestral habitats. The American Naturalist, 174, 255–267. - PubMed
    1. Agashe, D. , Falk, J. J. , & Bolnick, D. I. (2011). Effects of founding genetic variation on adaptation to a novel resource. Evolution, 65, 2481–2491. - PubMed
    1. Andersson, D. I. , Balaban, N. Q. , Baquero, F. , Courvalin, P. , Glaser, P. , Gophna, U. , Kishony, R. , Molin, S. , & Tønjum, T. (2020). Antibiotic resistance: Turning evolutionary principles into clinical reality. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 44, 171–188. - PubMed
    1. Andersson, D. I. , & Hughes, D. (2010). Antibiotic resistance and its cost: Is it possible to reverse resistance? Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8, 260–271. - PubMed