Towards evolutionary predictions: Current promises and challenges
- PMID: 36699126
- PMCID: PMC9850016
- DOI: 10.1111/eva.13513
Towards evolutionary predictions: Current promises and challenges
Abstract
Evolution has traditionally been a historical and descriptive science, and predicting future evolutionary processes has long been considered impossible. However, evolutionary predictions are increasingly being developed and used in medicine, agriculture, biotechnology and conservation biology. Evolutionary predictions may be used for different purposes, such as to prepare for the future, to try and change the course of evolution or to determine how well we understand evolutionary processes. Similarly, the exact aspect of the evolved population that we want to predict may also differ. For example, we could try to predict which genotype will dominate, the fitness of the population or the extinction probability of a population. In addition, there are many uses of evolutionary predictions that may not always be recognized as such. The main goal of this review is to increase awareness of methods and data in different research fields by showing the breadth of situations in which evolutionary predictions are made. We describe how diverse evolutionary predictions share a common structure described by the predictive scope, time scale and precision. Then, by using examples ranging from SARS-CoV2 and influenza to CRISPR-based gene drives and sustainable product formation in biotechnology, we discuss the methods for predicting evolution, the factors that affect predictability and how predictions can be used to prevent evolution in undesirable directions or to promote beneficial evolution (i.e. evolutionary control). We hope that this review will stimulate collaboration between fields by establishing a common language for evolutionary predictions.
Keywords: disease modelling; evolution; evolutionary control; models; population genetics; predictability; prediction.
© 2022 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Agashe, D. (2009). The stabilizing effect of intraspecific genetic variation on population dynamics in novel and ancestral habitats. The American Naturalist, 174, 255–267. - PubMed
-
- Agashe, D. , Falk, J. J. , & Bolnick, D. I. (2011). Effects of founding genetic variation on adaptation to a novel resource. Evolution, 65, 2481–2491. - PubMed
-
- Andersson, D. I. , Balaban, N. Q. , Baquero, F. , Courvalin, P. , Glaser, P. , Gophna, U. , Kishony, R. , Molin, S. , & Tønjum, T. (2020). Antibiotic resistance: Turning evolutionary principles into clinical reality. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 44, 171–188. - PubMed
-
- Andersson, D. I. , & Hughes, D. (2010). Antibiotic resistance and its cost: Is it possible to reverse resistance? Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8, 260–271. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
