Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 6;5(1):e0848.
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000848. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Predictive Modeling for Readmission to Intensive Care: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Predictive Modeling for Readmission to Intensive Care: A Systematic Review

Matthew M Ruppert et al. Crit Care Explor. .

Abstract

To evaluate the methodologic rigor and predictive performance of models predicting ICU readmission; to understand the characteristics of ideal prediction models; and to elucidate relationships between appropriate triage decisions and patient outcomes.

Data sources: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase.

Study selection: Primary literature that reported the development or validation of ICU readmission prediction models within from 2010 to 2021.

Data extraction: Relevant study information was extracted independently by two authors using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist. Bias was evaluated using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool. Data sources, modeling methodology, definition of outcomes, performance, and risk of bias were critically evaluated to elucidate relevant relationships.

Data synthesis: Thirty-three articles describing models were included. Six studies had a high overall risk of bias due to improper inclusion criteria or omission of critical analysis details. Four other studies had an unclear overall risk of bias due to lack of detail describing the analysis. Overall, the most common (50% of studies) source of bias was the filtering of candidate predictors via univariate analysis. The poorest performing models used existing clinical risk or acuity scores such as Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, or Stability and Workload Index for Transfer as the sole predictor. The higher-performing ICU readmission prediction models used homogenous patient populations, specifically defined outcomes, and routinely collected predictors that were analyzed over time.

Conclusions: Models predicting ICU readmission can achieve performance advantages by using longitudinal time series modeling, homogenous patient populations, and predictor variables tailored to those populations.

Keywords: critical care; critical illness; forecasting; intensive care units; risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barrett ML, Smith MW, Elixhauser A, et al. : Utilization of intensive care services, 2011: Statistical brief #185. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2014, 1–14
    1. Rosenberg AL, Watts C: Patients readmitted to ICUs*: A systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. Chest 2000; 118:492–502 - PubMed
    1. Cooper GS, Sirio CA, Rotondi AJ, et al. : Are readmissions to the intensive care unit a useful measure of hospital performance? Med Care 1999; 37:399–408 - PubMed
    1. Berenson RA; United States Congress Office of Technology Assessment: Intensive Care Units (ICUs): Clinical Outcomes, Costs, and Decisionmaking. Washington, DC, Congress of the U.S. For Sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., 1984
    1. Chen LM, Martin CM, Keenan SP, et al. : Patients readmitted to the intensive care unit during the same hospitalization: Clinical features and outcomes. Crit Care Med 1998; 26:1834–1841 - PubMed