Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the fully automated active robotic system in robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty
- PMID: 36699623
- PMCID: PMC9867974
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102106
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the fully automated active robotic system in robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Background: Use of semi-active and active robotic system for performing Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing. The novel fully automated active robotic system performs milling of the bone surfaces with a high speed burr. The aim of the current study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the system in robotic assisted TKA (RA-TKA).
Materials and methods: A single center clinical trial was conducted following 30 knees undergoing active RA-TKA for 6 months. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing RA-TKA for end stage arthritis. Patients undergoing conventional TKA and revision TKA were excluded from the study. Sample size was estimated to be 28 patients with α error of 0.05 and β error of 0.2 with power of study being 80. A pre-defined list of RA-TKA adverse events was employed to study the safety of the system. Efficacy was judged by comparing the planned versus achieved Implant size, alignment and limb alignment on post-operative radiographs. The post-operative clinical evaluation was done by an independent observer who was not part of the operating team. The primary safety and efficacy hypothesis was tested using a one sided Exact binomial test. The p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Pre-defined adverse events did not occur in any of the 30 RA-TKA (statistically significant p value < 0.001). The implant size accuracy was 100% (30 out of 30 knees) for femoral component and 96.67% (29 out of 30 knees) for tibial component (statistically significant, Chi-squared test, p value 0.0105 and 0.0461 respectively). The implant position and limb alignment was accurate in 100% of patients (p value < 0.001).
Conclusion: Early experience of the use of fully automated active robotic system in TKA shows that it is safe and also is effective in achieving accurate implant size and implant/limb alignment.
Keywords: Efficacy; Fully automated; Robotic assisted; Safety; Total knee arthroplasty.
© 2023 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Efficacy of the Pre-operative Three-Dimensional (3D) CT Scan Templating in Predicting Accurate Implant Size and Alignment in Robot Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.Indian J Orthop. 2022 Sep 17;56(12):2093-2100. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00742-0. eCollection 2022 Dec. Indian J Orthop. 2022. PMID: 36507208 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Image-Free Robotic-Assisted Technology in Enhancing Accuracy of Implant Sizing for Total Knee Arthroplasty.Cureus. 2024 Nov 22;16(11):e74256. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74256. eCollection 2024 Nov. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39712684 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-assisted TKA leads to a better prosthesis alignment and a better joint line restoration as compared to conventional TKA: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Feb;30(2):621-626. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06353-2. Epub 2020 Nov 9. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022. PMID: 33165631 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and reliability of active robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Postgrad Med J. 2019 Mar;95(1121):125-133. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136190. Epub 2019 Feb 26. Postgrad Med J. 2019. PMID: 30808721 Free PMC article.
-
Component placement accuracy in two generations of handheld robotics-assisted knee arthroplasty.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2059-2067. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04040-6. Epub 2021 Jul 25. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021. PMID: 34304279 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of next-generation robotic systems in transforming knee arthroplasty: precision and beyond.J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 15;19(1):393. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02560-6. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40664971 Review.
-
Inflammatory markers in conventional vs. active robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and other variables.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 6;26(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08585-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 40329267 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation Between Planned and Executed Bone Cuts Using Robotics in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study of 500 Patients.Indian J Orthop. 2024 Jun 7;58(8):1103-1108. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01196-2. eCollection 2024 Aug. Indian J Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39087031 Free PMC article.
-
Imageless Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Workflow Optimization, Operative Times, and Learning Curve.Cureus. 2025 Feb 11;17(2):e78880. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78880. eCollection 2025 Feb. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40092001 Free PMC article.
-
Improvised chest tube drainage: A practical approach to thoracic emergencies in humanitarian crises.Surg Pract Sci. 2025 Apr 9;21:100282. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100282. eCollection 2025 Jun. Surg Pract Sci. 2025. PMID: 40568379 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Riley L.H., Jr. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;192:34–39. - PubMed
-
- Heck D.A., Robinson R.L., Partridge C.M., Lubitz R.M., Freund D.A. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:93–110. - PubMed
-
- Kane R.L., Saleh K.J., Wilt T.J., Bershadsky B. The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1719–1724. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources